Here a very very Quick sample only wisstle (so no EPS etc) using this gear:
Everything was done on just base statts + the first 10 Statts points into strengh (like i did in the damage calculator aswell) and without abilitys
I did only Wistle (so no - Powershot from EPs what i stated earlier) but i did not wanna do 100 Runs to get an equal amount for some comparision,
According to the Damage calculator the axe will deal 24.50 avg.
Images show: 27.69 | 27.99 | 28.23 avg damage --> 27.97 avg ( 3.47 > Damage calculator)
According to the Damage calculator the Sword will deal 27.50 avg.
Images show: 27.89 | 31.85 | 30.11 avg damage --> 29.95 avg ( 2.45 > Damage calculator)
So what did we learn about that 10 min efford:
Yes on Paper/in Theorie Swords will deal more damage than Axe
But what else comes with this:
1. Axes do way more damage in reality than in the damage calculator
Reason: they crit way more, even on a very low access to statts
Conclution: the more statts you add, the better axes get - this does not count for swords
2. Swords do way less "True" damage to Monsters (just check the EXP Bars -> less Monsters killed)
Reason: Due to the wide Range swords gonna overkill
Conclution: Even thougth the avg / total Damage from axes is lower they monsters Lost "more life" while using axes
3. Axes got even more value than swords on exploring
Reason: EPs gonna let you hit on the Low end
Conclution: low end from axe >>> Swords
So even thought you are right with the "theoretical damage" you are completly wrong when it comes to game knowledge and how stuff end up working....
You better of to stop drinking and listen to people like
when it comes to LS knowledge, he does know better than you
E/like I mentioned before you should clearly work on your wording. Your behavior is even further of than your theories
This post was edited by 4ndr3as on May 19 2022 08:13am