See my correction. High frequency = more energy. I mixed up wavelength and frequency.

Youre talking about damage caused by UV or other forns of ionizing radiation.

Master radiation and molecular splitter here, no need to worry about radiation guys

Frequency is oscillations per second...

Amplitude is the energy / power

What are you doing


Egg scrambler alert

Like one of those anti flat earthers you just can't stay away you love to spew fake science


Oh ya I know the irony

Mainstream science = psudo science now a days

This post was edited by eMptyBox on Oct 6 2018 08:11am

The amplitude is worse the closer you are to the origin of the signal..

Stand next to a microwave you get microwaved..

Step away and it's less and less ..


Personally I am about to disable the hands free link in the car

It emits massive radiation, look it up. Spikes over health hazard zone. I used to test EMF

This post was edited by eMptyBox on Oct 6 2018 08:18am

Intensity is number of photons

Frequecy is proportional to the energy of each photon.

This isnt "modern science", this is like 100 years old now. You can find this in any intro chem book.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Oct 6 2018 09:32am

last time i checked this is about milimeter waves and microwaves

not photons

Photons are the word we use for the wave-like particle that transmits all electromagnetic radiation.

so i assume you are strickly speaking of the ionizing radiation

because this is at the low end of the spectrum that is non-ionizing


the non thermal radiation is the serious issue with this device(s)

This post was edited by eMptyBox on Oct 6 2018 09:39am

Thermal radiation is just that, thermal. It can increase temperature but thats it.

The devices dont emit radiation that is higher energy than thermal radiation.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Oct 6 2018 09:44am

this isnt true, according to you microwaves are at low spectrum, and itdoesincrease temperature... people cook with them every day.


they say that phones are non-ionizing and say they dont cause much radiation, i advise you to look into "the other side of the argument" and see that it is causing harm.. they mainly study the ionizing effects and heat radiation rather than the non-ionizing aspects


let me find what im talking about one sec

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-qzqOhDc_0 this guy does it amazing

maybe i can find u document so u dont have to watch 30 min vid, but i would recommend, i enjoyed his content



"Of course, there is also the SAR "heating effect" argument, which is part of the problem as we'll see..."

This post was edited by eMptyBox on Oct 6 2018 09:50am