Quote (Thor123422 @ Oct 6 2018 12:36pm)
I'll look at it.
Remember though, peer review doesn't mean something is true. It just means the methodology looks sound enough to be published. There are plenty of seemingly true things that were later proven totally wrong even though they had majority acceptance. I've read so many papers published by medical professionals that clearly violates the laws of thermodynamics, for instance.
Admittedly though, I hadn't considered the possibility that non-ionizing radiation would be strong enough to activate voltage-gated ion channels, which would definitely have an effect on cells that heavily express these kinds of proteins. So I'll take a look.
If this study is wrong, they need to do more of them.
If this study is right, you have gained a lot.
if this study is wrong, what did you even lose in the end....
definitely look at this.. they only focus on the SAR readings that have nothing to do with this aspect.. that is one of the main key points in these studies
i value the message of health and pass it on
This post was edited by eMptyBox on Oct 6 2018 11:41am