d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Swing Swing And Strzok Out > No, It's Not Anti-trump Texts
Prev134567Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 9,943
Joined: Mar 30 2010
Gold: 18,534.02
Aug 15 2018 07:50am
Glad he was fired. Scumbag.

Of course, he'll be a hero to the left. I hear his crowdfunding page has exploded since his dishonorable ejection.

Member
Posts: 5,942
Joined: Apr 29 2018
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Aug 15 2018 07:52am
Quote (djman72 @ Aug 15 2018 09:50am)
Glad he was fired. Scumbag.

Of course, he'll be a hero to the left. I hear his crowdfunding page has exploded since his dishonorable ejection.


lol, not a Hero, but I do give him credit for standing up to the bullies in the Kangaroo Court that is the House G.O.P.

already over $100,000 as of last night, and I'm sure it's probably double that by now.

Member
Posts: 25,860
Joined: Jun 14 2006
Gold: 381.00
Trader: Trusted
Aug 15 2018 07:58am
Quote (Horford @ Aug 15 2018 08:50am)
"creating the appearance" that investigative decisions were impacted =/= investigative decisions were impacted. (Horowitz explicitly said that no major FBI decisions/actions were effected by political bias, yet you keep choosing to ignore this lol).

on your last quote, Horowitz basically means "we can't be sure that Stzrok's supposed 'bias' didn't make him prioritize one investigation". that doesn't mean actions were affected, as horowitz said, it just means Strzok may have thought one investigation was more important than the other. Let's be real, what's more important, Anthony Weiner's laptop? or a foreign country electing our president?


Since 1 is existent and 1 isn't... the laptop.
I did say it mentions Strzok numerous times. and that is short-selling it.
i believe the actual number Strzok was mentioned was around 600x.

again that final line was in specific to 1 thing, and also false if you read "any" other part of the IG.
you can't take such a large report, and only accept 1 line out of it.
especially when that 1 line, contradicts everything else from the report.

i can keep linking mentioning of Strzok though in the IG. Maybe you can find 1 more quote from the IG that is in Strzok's favour?
Member
Posts: 48,563
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 5,016.77
Aug 15 2018 08:03am
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/you-stepped-in-it-here-how-anti-trump-texts-ruined-the-career-of-the-fbis-go-to-agent/2018/08/13/eb1868be-9401-11e8-a679-b09212fb69c2_story.html



Quote (djman72 @ Aug 15 2018 08:50am)
Glad he was fired. Scumbag.

Of course, he'll be a hero to the left. I hear his crowdfunding page has exploded since his dishonorable ejection.


He was by all accounts an excellent counter-intel agent who worked to investigate terrorists and spies. He made the mistake of expressing his political opinions on his work phone while serving on high profile political investigations. The only reason his conduct has damaged the reputation of the FBI so much is because we're living in a hyperpartisan environment where Republicans are seeking to undermine our institutions of justice for political points.
Member
Posts: 5,942
Joined: Apr 29 2018
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Aug 15 2018 08:06am
Quote (tagged4nothing @ Aug 15 2018 09:58am)
Since 1 is existent and 1 isn't... the laptop.
I did say it mentions Strzok numerous times. and that is short-selling it.
i believe the actual number Strzok was mentioned was around 600x.

again that final line was in specific to 1 thing, and also false if you read "any" other part of the IG.
you can't take such a large report, and only accept 1 line out of it.
especially when that 1 line, contradicts everything else from the report.

i can keep linking mentioning of Strzok though in the IG. Maybe you can find 1 more quote from the IG that is in Strzok's favour?


you don't even understand the report apparently so how would you know if that 1 line you're ignoring "contradicts" everything else? (I'll give you a hint, it doesn't contradict anything)
Member
Posts: 5,942
Joined: Apr 29 2018
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Aug 15 2018 08:08am
Quote (IceMage @ Aug 15 2018 10:03am)
Republicans are seeking to undermine our institutions of justice for political points.


Devin Nunes likes this
Member
Posts: 25,860
Joined: Jun 14 2006
Gold: 381.00
Trader: Trusted
Aug 15 2018 08:09am
Quote (IceMage @ Aug 15 2018 09:03am)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/you-stepped-in-it-here-how-anti-trump-texts-ruined-the-career-of-the-fbis-go-to-agent/2018/08/13/eb1868be-9401-11e8-a679-b09212fb69c2_story.html





He was by all accounts an excellent counter-intel agent who worked to investigate terrorists and spies. He made the mistake of expressing his political opinions on his work phone while serving on high profile political investigations. The only reason his conduct has damaged the reputation of the FBI so much is because we're living in a hyperpartisan environment where Republicans are seeking to undermine our institutions of justice for political points.

No. it's because Hilary was exonerated before she was even questioned.
Evidence destroyed under watch of Strzok.

Then immediately opening Trump/Russia investigation without any evidence and 2 fake dossiers.

All you're saying right now is "can't trust the FBI any more"
how many roffle waffles you guys gonna bring to this thread? seriously the "no u" is getting old

Quote (Horford @ Aug 15 2018 09:06am)
you don't even understand the report apparently so how would you know if that 1 line you're ignoring "contradicts" everything else? (I'll give you a hint, it doesn't contradict anything)

under what claim do i not understand, but you do?
you have only heard 1 quote from the report that has been echo'd on CNN for the past few months.
How much else do you know? you sure don't prove you know anything

This post was edited by tagged4nothing on Aug 15 2018 08:10am
Member
Posts: 5,942
Joined: Apr 29 2018
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Aug 15 2018 08:11am
Quote (tagged4nothing @ Aug 15 2018 10:09am)
No. it's because Hilary was exonerated before she was even questioned.
Evidence destroyed under watch of Strzok.

Then immediately opening Trump/Russia investigation without any evidence and 2 fake dossiers.

All you're saying right now is "can't trust the FBI any more"
how many roffle waffles you guys gonna bring to this thread? seriously the "no u" is getting old


"fake dossiers"

bahahaha

less Fox News for you...
Member
Posts: 25,860
Joined: Jun 14 2006
Gold: 381.00
Trader: Trusted
Aug 15 2018 08:12am
Quote (Horford @ Aug 15 2018 09:11am)
"fake dossiers"

bahahaha

less Fox News for you...


there were 3 dossiers. there is only supposed to be 1.
the fact you are not alarmed by that only shows how biased you are to the subject

that 1 was handed off by Bruce Ohr. which has relation to the Clinton candidate.

This post was edited by tagged4nothing on Aug 15 2018 08:13am
Member
Posts: 5,942
Joined: Apr 29 2018
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Aug 15 2018 08:15am
Quote (tagged4nothing @ Aug 15 2018 10:09am)
No. it's because Hilary was exonerated before she was even questioned.
Evidence destroyed under watch of Strzok.

Then immediately opening Trump/Russia investigation without any evidence and 2 fake dossiers.

All you're saying right now is "can't trust the FBI any more"
how many roffle waffles you guys gonna bring to this thread? seriously the "no u" is getting old


under what claim do i not understand, but you do?
you have only heard 1 quote from the report that has been echo'd on CNN for the past few months.
How much else do you know? you sure don't prove you know anything


I know enough to know that NO FBI decisions were the direct results of Strzok's supposed political bias, as stated by Horowitz' report...
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev134567Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll