Quote (Horford @ Aug 15 2018 08:50am)
"creating the appearance" that investigative decisions were impacted =/= investigative decisions were impacted. (Horowitz explicitly said that no major FBI decisions/actions were effected by political bias, yet you keep choosing to ignore this lol).
on your last quote, Horowitz basically means "we can't be sure that Stzrok's supposed 'bias' didn't make him prioritize one investigation". that doesn't mean actions were affected, as horowitz said, it just means Strzok may have thought one investigation was more important than the other. Let's be real, what's more important, Anthony Weiner's laptop? or a foreign country electing our president?
Since 1 is existent and 1 isn't... the laptop.
I did say it mentions Strzok numerous times. and that is short-selling it.
i believe the actual number Strzok was mentioned was around 600x.
again that final line was in specific to 1 thing, and also false if you read "any" other part of the IG.
you can't take such a large report, and only accept 1 line out of it.
especially when that 1 line, contradicts everything else from the report.
i can keep linking mentioning of Strzok though in the IG. Maybe you can find 1 more quote from the IG that is in Strzok's favour?