funny watching lefties donate to such noble causes. between donating to subversive wierdos who were fired for cause and donating to people who make up fake hate crimes the lefties are sure finding great uses to all the extra money they gained in this tremendous economy under drumpf

how can you call a dossier completely fake when a lot of information has been verified in it?! (referring specifically to the Steele dossier)

in all my news heres:

"United States: FBI dismissed for anti-trump texting sent to his mistress"

So IMO the only bias / fake news here is the OP & "fox news"

If you just put forth debunked or misleading talking points, we aren't going to have a real discussion.

prove it. i've listed 2 quotes from the IG report that directly conflict with the last quote on the report that you have referred too.
i can list many many more. you cannot list even 1 more.
Having Clinton use Bleachbit before you show up to question her... that's not an action of concern?
he told them to do it before he got there...

here's the report. good luck lol
https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download


what point did you bring up for me to address?
oh right. republican/FBI conspiracy.

This post was edited by tagged4nothing on Aug 15 2018 08:24am

sure i'll prove it (assuming that is you find Horowitz and Chris Wray to be credible)


https://freebeacon.com/national-security/justice-dept-ig-not-confidence-strzok-acted-free-bias/



https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/fbi-director-christopher-wrays-statement-on-release-of-inspector-generals-report

i gave you the IG report to read. you come back with statements from other ppl...
these statements are obviously a bit misleading, if you even read the quotes i gave you. they are directly in contradiction.
I have to get going to work, but i'll respond better to this when i get back.

i suggest you come up with more than this, this will be easy to dismantle.

Kind of a big problem. Also, hilarious that you have this sentence in the same post as your "republicans seek to undermine institutions of justice for political points"

You're staring at an exact example of a democrat doing the exact thing you accuse (R) of doing.

u can keep repeating this ad naeseum but the IG report found he prioritized the Trump investigation over the HRC investigation, and couldn't rule out bias in any way in making the decision. It's like saying "we dont have video of him on the crime scene, but have proof he was in the area with no alibi". it's a sizzling gun if not actively smoking.

that sentence you're leaning on like a crutch just says none of the decisions in the investigation themselves show bias, an example would be OK'ing some sort of surveillance without just cause to do so, or ignoring a tip on HRC without just cause.

It's a problem in terms of appearances... but unless you want the FBI to monitor the private communications of every agent working on a political investigation, you're going to have to accept that those guys and gals might have negative opinions of the people they are investigating.

I don't know what you mean on the last point.

This post was edited by IceMage on Aug 15 2018 09:05am