Quote (Massous24 @ Oct 12 2019 09:57am)
You don’t know the joker then. His origin story? Do you know how the joker actually becomes the joker?
Edit : and it is important to mention that his name is jack in the comics- and in previous films. Clearly, this isn’t an origin film of the joker that we know.
Literally the only place the Joker's original name is Jack is in Tim Burton's Batman with Jack Nicholson. The Joker in the comics uses that name as one of his many aliases, because of the movie. It's an Easter egg, not his real name. The entire concept of the Joker is his anonymous backstory. He doesn't have a real name outside of Joker. Most origins show him as an unnamed leader of the red hood gang falling into a chemical vat. The entire point of the red hood gang is the "leader" being anonymous and constantly changing, in every origin where this happens no one actually knows who it is under the hood.
The killing joke is the most famous telling of the Joker origin, but if you read that and thought "this is his origin" then you missed the entire point of that comic and also a lot of the dialogue. He literally says some times this is true, sometimes it isn't, he prefers his past to be multiple choice. As in it isn't his true backstory, none of them are. Not to mention the Joker's entire thesis in the killing joke is ultimately disproven when Gorden doesn't break, essentially calling into question his entire story of his past up to that point.
There is no concrete backstory of the Joker, which allows writers to take him in many different interesting and unique directions, which is the entire point of that character.
Edit: typos
Edit: also in the Burton movie Jack is the one who kills Bruce's parents, but it's hard canon that the killer is actually Joe Chill, so using that as your go to origin story for Joker is fucking absurd. Please sit down now.
This post was edited by Blah58 on Oct 12 2019 04:05pm