Quote (GodSmiter @ 25 Jun 2022 12:24)
Most corporate drone sht I've read on a while.
Y'Ceo?
If you want to operate a business where you're wearing wildly inappropriate clothing that detracts from the products and services you offer, and puts all the focus on you personally, by all means! Best of luck to you in your endeavors.
If you plan to work for somebody else, the terms of your employment, especially as regards to dress code, are whatever the person who pays you says they are. That's not "corporate", that's simply called "business".
I note that you fail entirely to address the issue that these children aren't purchasing their own clothes. So when some kid walks into class wearing a massive trenchcoat, or a hoody that's covering their face, or whatever else that's been deemed "inappropriate" it's not because they are "expressing themselves". It's because their parents have chosen that as an acceptable form of expression for them. And that's fine outside of school. Inside a school, the focus is on education, not "expression". Schools are not "homes for children". Schools are educational institutions designed to prepare children to be productive adults.
Anyone who attempts to claim "self-expression" should even be a factor in schools should be treated with extreme mistrust. Their agenda is not educating your children, and let's not forget, on a per capita basis, school staff is twice as likely to sexually assault children than catholic priests. Except, there are over 28x more school staff than catholic priests, and school staff make up one the largest child sexual predators, based on FBI Crime Stats of anyone on the planet. Thus, not only would these non-sexual, gender neutral dress codes likely enhance the learning environment, but it might help reduce the likelihood of sexual assault from the adults that are supposed to be "teaching" these children.