d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > 3 State California? > 52 U S States?
Prev12345611Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 104,209
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,655.00
Jul 19 2018 04:20pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Jul 19 2018 05:26am)
You're posting on a computer.

Last I checked the only two processor companies got their start and did all their research in California for like 20 years.

The funny thing is a lot of people will say things like what you just did without realizing California is easily the most important state in the Union.




Quote
Texas Instruments Inc. (TI) is an American technology company that designs and manufactures semiconductors and various integrated circuits, which it sells to electronics designers and manufacturers globally.[4] Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, United States, TI is one of the top ten semiconductor companies worldwide, based on sales volume.[5] Texas Instruments's focus is on developing analog chips and embedded processors, which accounts for more than 80% of their revenue.[6] TI also produces TI digital light processing (DLP) technology and education technology[6] products including calculators, microcontrollers and multi-core processors. To date, TI has more than 43,000 patents worldwide.[7]

Texas Instruments emerged in 1951 after a reorganization of Geophysical Service Incorporated, a company founded in 1930 that manufactured equipment for use in the seismic industry, as well as defense electronics.[8] TI produced the world's first commercial silicon transistor in 1954[9], and designed and manufactured the first transistor radio in 1954. Jack Kilby invented the integrated circuit in 1958 while working at TI's Central Research Labs. TI also invented the hand-held calculator in 1967, and introduced the first single-chip microcontroller (MCU) in 1970, which combined all the elements of computing onto one piece of silicon.[10]



3 years before William Shockley, and anything at all to do with California.
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Jul 19 2018 11:04pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Jul 19 2018 04:40am)
If you split California and ANY of them vote Republican then it tilts the electoral college heavily in Republicans favor, and northern California definitely favors Republicans.

If you deny this then you're just at odds with reality.


If you look at the way the counties split, the Democrats would have won every Presidential election since 2004. You MIGHT get 1 GOP senator in the "South California" state but that's still a net gain of 2 senators for the Democrats.
Member
Posts: 64,656
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Jul 19 2018 11:30pm
Quote (thundercock @ Jul 19 2018 11:04pm)
If you look at the way the counties split, the Democrats would have won every Presidential election since 2004. You MIGHT get 1 GOP senator in the "South California" state but that's still a net gain of 2 senators for the Democrats.


Interesting.

So I guess Cali gets even more electoral votes after split?
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Jul 19 2018 11:54pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Jul 19 2018 09:30pm)
Interesting.

So I guess Cali gets even more electoral votes after split?


Correct. They'd get 53 electoral votes split among the 3 states given the current census PLUS 2 EVs each for a grand total of 59. It doesn't matter though because the CA Supreme Court ruled that the ballot measure is unconstitutional.
Member
Posts: 104,209
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,655.00
Jul 20 2018 12:00am
Quote (thundercock @ Jul 20 2018 01:54am)
Correct. They'd get 53 electoral votes split among the 3 states given the current census PLUS 2 EVs each for a grand total of 59. It doesn't matter though because the CA Supreme Court ruled that the ballot measure is unconstitutional.




Actually they just pulled it off the November ballot...


Quote
State election officials certified last month that supporters of the so-called Cal3 measure, also known as Proposition 9, had collected enough signatures to qualify it for the ballot in the country’s most populous state.

An environmental group, the Planning and Conservation League, challenged the measure in court, arguing it posed a “revision” of the state constitution - as opposed to an amendment - that is too sweeping to be legally subjected to the direct consent of the voters.

Siding with opponents for the time being, the court directed state election officials to keep the measure off the upcoming November ballot to allow the justices sufficient time to review and decide the merits of the case.

The court left open the possibility of allowing the initiative to be put before voters in the future, saying the “potential harm in permitting the measure to remain on the ballot outweighs” the harm of its delay.
Member
Posts: 64,656
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Jul 20 2018 12:14am
Quote (thundercock @ Jul 19 2018 11:54pm)
Correct. They'd get 53 electoral votes split among the 3 states given the current census PLUS 2 EVs each for a grand total of 59. It doesn't matter though because the CA Supreme Court ruled that the ballot measure is unconstitutional.


I don't see how that gives dems wins since 2004. That's only a few extra electoral votes
Member
Posts: 51,396
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,400.67
Jul 20 2018 02:46am
Quote (Santara @ 20 Jul 2018 00:06)
"Original" California keeps its two Democrats, and the two new Californias add 3 Democrats and 1 Republican. THAT is a net win for Democrats. Northern California includes the 7+ million people of the San Francisco Bay area.


thats the point: if you split up california in 3 equal-area parts from north to south, then the northern part would have a very low population and a republican lean. but if you split it up from north to south in 3 blocs of equal population, all 3 of them would still be safe (D) states. the dems would trade 2 democratic senators for 5-6 democratic senators plus 0-1 GOP senators, for a net gain of 2-4 senators.
Member
Posts: 51,948
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,933.00
Jul 20 2018 05:26am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jul 20 2018 03:46am)
thats the point: if you split up california in 3 equal-area parts from north to south, then the northern part would have a very low population and a republican lean. but if you split it up from north to south in 3 blocs of equal population, all 3 of them would still be safe (D) states. the dems would trade 2 democratic senators for 5-6 democratic senators plus 0-1 GOP senators, for a net gain of 2-4 senators.


And this latest proposal had pretty comparable populations for the three.
Member
Posts: 15,032
Joined: Apr 30 2008
Gold: 3.37
Jul 20 2018 05:31am
I remember posting a similar tgread like a year ago...
Member
Posts: 104,209
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,655.00
Jul 20 2018 05:36am
Quote (Ep0ch @ Jul 20 2018 07:31am)
I remember posting a similar tgread like a year ago...




Yeah, that was when they were gonna split into 6 states.


/e It never made it past the petition stage. This 3 state idea did make it past the petition, and almost made it to the November ballot.

This post was edited by Ghot on Jul 20 2018 05:37am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev12345611Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll