Quote (thesnipa @ 14 Aug 2018 16:47)
that's not what that means really. it's true that presidential approval ratings are a metric with which to gauge enthusiasm, but it's not inherently tied together. So far in special elections Dems have been up points in 2016 red districts in many places, while GOP has been steady from 2016, down, or well down in some places. Districts like Tim Kaine were wide open with a good candidate, but the GOP hasn't been able to get enthusiasm back. Even the marketting is geared towards fear mongering with common messaging being "do you want this senator to obstruct in congress" or "Nancy Pelosi would be a disaster as speaker". Rather than "elect this person to help President Trump get legislation done". It's focussed on pealing back support for the dems rather than rallying around Trump.
Dems have the enthusiasm, youth turnout seems up. How many seats that actually results in flipping isn't clear yet tho.
well, yeah, approval and enthusiasm are not the same thing. but they are closely related. and lets not forget that Trump was able to win in 2016 with a super-enthusiastic core base which made up around 25% of the electorate, plus a wider base of reluctant republican voters who werent keen on him at all, but stayed with "their" team in the end.
on the other side, clinton also had a core base of maybe 20-25% of the electorate who were really behind her, plus a wider base of democrats who werent enthused by her at all.
in the midterms, trump will not be on the ballot himself, which might bring down turnout among his core base, but it might also raise the turnout from those who were reluctant trump voters in 2016. this should rooooughly balance out.
the bigger issue from the GOP's view is that the democrats arent dragged down by clinton this time around, while they are equally (if not even more) energized by their opposition to trump.