Quote (cambovenzi @ 12 Nov 2019 09:21)
Yes diplomacy and investigating corruption is just like armed bank robbery to you. what a great comparison.
when repeated and undeniable violations of federal election law, in order to get dirt on your political opponent, are merely
"diplomacy and investigating corruption" to you, you know that you're a cultist.
here are some FACTS that you're unsurprisingly unaware of, considering the bubble you live in:
Quote (fender @ 11 Nov 2019 10:07)
- first of all, it explicitly states on the first page that it's NOT a verbatim transcript. the actual transcript and recording of that 'perfect call' are hidden away on a server for top secret material. so if the trump team is so sure there's nothing bad about his call they should release them.
- secondly, you don't have to use the words 'i want you to do x, otherwise you won't get y' in order for a 'court-thight' quid pro quo to be established. the timing of the call and trump's team freezing the funds, as well as the obvious and not very subtle implications that even the polished 'transcript' documents, don't allow for any reasonable doubt - if you're not actively trying not to see it.
- EU ambassador sondland, a loyal trump toady, who donated a million dollars of his own money to trump's campaign and acted for weeks like he couldn't recall the administration putting any pressure on ukraine amended his testimony, acknowledging a quid pro quo.
- mick mulvaney admitted it was a quid pro quo on national tv.
- trump asked ukraine and china to investigate the bidens on national tv (yet another federal election law violation btw).
- there already was a history of trump withholding aid to pressure ukraine into doing personal favours for him: in 2018 he delayed the delivery of javelin anti-tank missiles to force then president poroshenko to stop cooperating with the mueller investigation into manafort's ukraine dealings (so much for donnie bonespur being really concerned with corruption in ukraine).