Quote (Ghot @ 12 Nov 2019 13:03)

Hillary herself proved her guilt, by destroying 33K emails that she had been subpoenaed to prove.

Is there something wrong with your memory? Or is it just a hangover?

Quote (fender @ Nov 12 2019 07:06am)

hey boomer, why is trump hiding his 'perfect call' and the real transcript on a server for top secret material?

Quote

Trump said on Saturday he would likely release the transcript on Tuesday, describing it to reporters as “very important.” He said on Twitter on Monday evening, however, that he would be releasing it “sometime this week,” adding: “I am sure you will find it tantalizing!”

Quote

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - White House acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney on Monday withdrew his request to join a lawsuit seeking a court ruling on whether witnesses must testify in the U.S. House of Representatives impeachment probe into President Donald Trump, saying he would bring his own case, according to a court document.

Mulvaney had earlier sought to participate in a lawsuit filed by Charles Kupperman, a former deputy to ousted national security adviser John Bolton, seeking a court ruling on whether he should comply with a congressional subpoena or honor the Trump administration’s order not to testify.

Mulvaney withdrew the request following a conference call closed to the public held by the judge assigned to Kupperman’s lawsuit, U.S. District Judge Richard Leon in Washington.

According to a transcript of the hearing, Leon said he was “inclined” to deny Mulvaney’s request to intervene and encouraged him to instead file his own lawsuit.

Last week, House Democrats withdrew their subpoena to Kupperman, saying they did not want to delay the impeachment investigation, and asked a judge to dismiss the litigation as moot.

Mulvaney “can’t intervene into a moot case,” Todd Tatelman, a lawyer for the House, said during Monday’s hearing.

Quote (Ghot @ 12 Nov 2019 13:08)

You want me to act like a Democrat and just... guess? LOL

/e Oh look...


As impeachment probe starts new phase, Trump promises to release transcript

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-impeachment/as-impeachment-probe-starts-new-phase-trump-promises-to-release-transcript-idUSKBN1XM1E2





...maybe he held it on a secure server so the Dems couldn't accidentally delete it. :lol:






/e But wait. There's more!!





White House's Mulvaney to sue over House impeachment subpoenas

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-impeachment-mulvaney/white-houses-mulvaney-to-sue-over-house-impeachment-subpoenas-idUSKBN1XL2MQ






Seems the smoke part of the smoke and mirrors... is dissipating. :D

Quote (fender @ Nov 12 2019 08:01am)

just like he will totally release his tax returns, huh?

Quote (Ghot @ Nov 12 2019 08:10am)

You're overlooking the difference between a campaign promise and a current promise.



/e I see no reason for Trump to release the full transcript, unless he knows it will exonerate him. Ergo, I assume he will in fact release the transcript. There would be no other reason to even bring it up.

Quote (Skinned @ Nov 12 2019 08:20am)

Honor is a foreign concept to you guys lol.

Quote

The other case raised at the January 2016 meeting, Telizhenko said, involved Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian energy company under investigation in Ukraine for improper foreign transfers of money. At the time, Burisma allegedly was paying then-Vice President Joe Biden’s son Hunter as both a board member and a consultant. More than $3 million flowed from Ukraine to an American firm tied to Hunter Biden in 2014-15, bank records show.

According to Telizhenko, U.S. officials told the Ukrainians they would prefer that Kiev drop the Burisma probe and allow the FBI to take it over. The Ukrainians did not agree. But then Joe Biden pressured Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to fire Ukraine’s chief prosecutor in March 2016, as I previously reported. The Burisma case was transferred to NABU, then shut down.

Quote

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/ciaramella-telizhenko-600x111.jpg

Today we confirmed that this was the only listed White House meeting attended by Andrii Telizhenko in 2016.

This was also the meeting where Hunter Biden was discussed.

This was the meeting where Ukrainians were told to end their investigation of Hunter Biden.

And White House expert Eric Ciaramella HOSTED the January 19, 2016 meeting.

Quote (Ghot @ Nov 13 2019 12:40am)

Trump used to have honor, but then he met the Dems. :/




/e post #1372

Quote (Goomshill @ 13 Nov 2019 01:53)

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/update-whistleblower-eric-ciaramalla-hosted-jan-19-2016-wh-mtg-w-soros-lackey-same-day-ukraine-told-in-wh-mtg-to-fire-prosecutor-investigating-hunter-biden/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/huge-whistleblower-eric-ciaramella-was-hosting-2016-wh-meeting-where-ukrainian-officials-were-told-to-drop-investigation-of-hunter-biden/
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/440730-how-the-obama-white-house-engaged-ukraine-to-give-russia-collusion



https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/disclosures/visitor-records


Eric Ciaramella hosted the very meeting where Ukrainian prosecutors were told to drop the investigation into Burisma.
Previously all we knew was his ideological standing, connections to Biden and involvement in the email chains concerning withholding the aid.
Now we have him in the room with the Ukrainian official who was told by the White House to shut down the Burisma investigation.

So yes, Eric Ciaramella is directly involved