ok
i think we have covered the first great fraud of atheist chit science, Hackels drawings a 100 year lie.

for this post I will talk about the 2nd atheist/antitheist great fraud.

Piltdown man, perhaps the most famous fraud sat on a self for 40 years (with out being tested which is at the very least, sloppy science) after 40 years (when most involved had passed on) it was finally tested and found to be a fraud. a 40 year lie........how can atheists/antitheists stand it?

hard to believe some of the total absurdities found in atheist/antitheist historical accounts as they make a mad dash trying to disprove a creator.

today just a short little entry

Nebraska man was a transitional monkey to man fossil based on a tooth. ya lol a tooth.
latter it was found out to be a pigs tooth. this crock of chit was peddled for 10 years (heehaw atheist/antitheist "science")

Nebraska Man
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nebraska_Man
excerpt:
Nebraska Man was a name applied to Hesperopithecus haroldcookii, a putative species of ape. It was heralded as the first higher primate of North America. It was originally described by Henry Fairfield Osborn in 1922, on the basis of a tooth found by rancher and geologist Harold Cook in Nebraska in 1917. Although Nebraska man was not a deliberate hoax, the original classification proved to be a mistake, and was retracted in 1927.

This post was edited by TiStuff on Oct 21 2022 11:23pm

this one have you rolling all over the floor
it extraordinary what the super duper logical athiest thinker can get away with
Whale evolution- A skeleton was found, missing all 4 legs and tail so the "skeptic" scientist drew in flippers and a fluke and said, proof of whale evolution. Later they found full skeleton and had to get out the eraser.

Scientists Convinced by False Evidence From Other Scientists! Whale Evolution - Dr. Carl Werner

Fossil Record is Proof of Noah's Flood

like to think of these religious arguments as more of a philosophical argument than a scientific one .

your subjective reasoning would be more appreciated in GC

I mean unless youre arguing specific parts of scripture that make claims that can be scientifically refuted then it is a philosophical argument , that's what religion is .

theres only so much scientific matter in the realm of theist belief and worship .

science can only refute things like the timeline for the creation of earth or dinosaurs or a great flood . the subject matter is very limited .

In most cases science and religion have no conflict , for example the big bang actually supports a creationists viewpoint .
or the fact that abiogenesis and other creation of life theories are still not proven or even agreed upon and therefor there's no argument to be had .

i am not arguing scripture here I am exposing chit science. take a look at post 123 an an example. how do these people get away with it?

title of thread " Atheist/antitheist Chit Science"

Of courrse... because it's not like they can provide evidence. At the end it is based on "belief" and trust.

hAHAHAHA this thread i clown atheist so called science and thats all you can say about it. hhhHHAHAHAHHA like coment #123 dude fins a fossil with out limbs and a tail so dude draws in a fluke nad flippers and puts it in whale line up huh huh huh HAHAHAHAHAH. cant imaging a atheist/antitheist would show his face here after that one HAHAHAHAHAH