d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine
Prev1428142824283428442854300Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 37,639
Joined: Nov 16 2005
Gold: 13.37
May 7 2024 10:36am
Quote (Santara @ 7 May 2024 12:50)
Puerto Rico voted to join the US as the 51st state.

If Crimea was autonomous under one Kyiv regime, why wouldn't they remain autonomous under the next?



In the same sense that Americans have been manipulated by Russian troll farms. The troll farms didn't make Americans DO anything, but their influence is undeniable. Same in Ukraine. No one was MADE to protest the corruption inherent in the Ukrainian polity, but it helped.


March, 17th 1995 that's why. Kyev deprived Crimea of it's autonomy.
Member
Posts: 51,944
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,933.00
May 7 2024 05:00pm
Quote (Djunior @ May 7 2024 09:20am)
Trump won because the Dem candidate was dogshit not because of Russians. Massive self own, lol

If the Russians could so easily pick their guy of choice to win the US elections they would do so every single time or wouldn't they. Not just in 2016. And not just in the US but everywhere.

Can't believe you parrot this nonsense


Clinton was dog shit, and so was Trump. None of this takes away from the fact that Russia promoted his campaign on social media.

Quote (Goomshill @ May 7 2024 11:05am)
Well they had plurality vote control over the one regime and the other was bombing them. During the abortive negotiations prior to the invasion the DPR/LPR definitely wanted to stay autonomous, though Crimea was already de facto annexed. Its just a choice they no longer had at that point, not just taken from them by Russia's little green men, the separatist regions wouldn't be able to withstand the western backed siege without them. They aren't the first conflict region to be in a tug of war between great powers like children squabbling over toys, and they had every reason to pick the side they aligned with and could protect them.


In 2013 when that survey was taken, no one was bombing Crimea. In 2014, Russia annexed.

Quote (Norlander @ May 7 2024 11:36am)
March, 17th 1995 that's why. Kyev deprived Crimea of it's autonomy.


Then why were they being polled about their autonomy as if it existed in 2011 and 2013?
Member
Posts: 45,945
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 22,189.49
May 7 2024 09:03pm
Quote (Santara @ May 7 2024 06:00pm)
Clinton was dog shit, and so was Trump. None of this takes away from the fact that Russia promoted his campaign on social media.
In 2013 when that survey was taken, no one was bombing Crimea. In 2014, Russia annexed
Then why were they being polled about their autonomy as if it existed in 2011 and 2013?


Well yeah in 2013 the voters in the Donbas held control of the national government and the governor of Donetsk had become the President of Ukraine. In 2014 the Yanukovych supporters were being burned alive in Odessa I mean, it just seems self evident to me that everyone would prefer to get their way- rule of a country, self-rule in a separatist region, rule of their house. And if they can't get their autonomy and self-determination, they'd rather align with the guys who support them than the ones trying to kill them.

Democracy as a concept only works when there's a mandate from the governed to accede to the will of the voters. If the DPR/LPR/Crimea had tried to secede after losing an election like the American south did, we'd have a much different narrative. But instead we're talking about a country that was a unified national democracy, then was overthrown by force to overturn the will of the voters. At that point, there is no mandate, democracy is just a fig leaf and the only true claim on a land is those who hold it by force. If Zelensky had conquered the east and planted a Ukrainian flag, he could claim the subjugated lands. Assad did it, after all. It would make him the legitimate ruler, if not a democratic one. But as long as the revolutionaries in Kiev have never held the east for a day, I don't see what claim they have
Member
Posts: 37,639
Joined: Nov 16 2005
Gold: 13.37
May 8 2024 02:20am
Quote (Santara @ 8 May 2024 02:00)
Clinton was dog shit, and so was Trump. None of this takes away from the fact that Russia promoted his campaign on social media.



In 2013 when that survey was taken, no one was bombing Crimea. In 2014, Russia annexed.



Then why were they being polled about their autonomy as if it existed in 2011 and 2013?


Good question, they also got polled in 2014
Member
Posts: 14,009
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 98,921.50
May 8 2024 02:38am
Quote (Santara @ May 8 2024 01:00am)
Clinton was dog shit, and so was Trump. None of this takes away from the fact that Russia promoted his campaign on social media.

In 2013 when that survey was taken, no one was bombing Crimea. In 2014, Russia annexed.

Then why were they being polled about their autonomy as if it existed in 2011 and 2013?


Russia annexed Crimea after the Maidan putsch where high ranking Western officials were openly involved and no you cannot possibly compare this to social media trolls promoting Trump SMH

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_annexation_of_Crimea_by_the_Russian_Federation

Quote
The annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation took place in the aftermath of the 2014 Ukrainian revolution. On 22–23 February, Russian President Vladimir Putin convened an all-night meeting with security services chiefs to discuss pullout of deposed President, Viktor Yanukovych, and at the end of that meeting Putin remarked that "we must start working on returning Crimea to Russia.".[1] Russia sent in soldiers on February 27, 2014. Crimea held a referendum. According to official Russian and Crimean sources 95% voted to reunite with Russia. The legitimacy of the referendum has been questioned by the international community on both legal and procedural grounds.


Member
Posts: 14,009
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 98,921.50
May 8 2024 02:53am
Quote (Prox1m1ty @ May 6 2024 11:46am)
"Ukrainian man who was drafted into the russian army from an occupied territory ended up shooting 6 russian occupiers to death. The russians are now furious and are searching for him"


Meanwhile two Ukrainian security officials were detained over Zelensky assassination plot while Putin was sworn in for his fifth term as Russian president.

And we were told Putin was going to be assassinated by his generals after the sanctions had completely crippled Russia :rofl:

Can't make this shit up

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/07/world/europe/ukraine-russia-zelensky-plot.html

Quote
The Ukrainian security services arrested two Ukrainian colonels and accused them of spying for Russia. They said the plot also targeted top Ukrainian intelligence officials.


Member
Posts: 18,348
Joined: Apr 13 2016
Gold: 127,278.50
May 8 2024 03:32am
Quote (Djunior @ May 8 2024 09:53am)
Meanwhile two Ukrainian security officials were detained over Zelensky assassination plot while Putin was sworn in for his fifth term as Russian president.

And we were told Putin was going to be assassinated by his generals after the sanctions had completely crippled Russia :rofl:

Can't make this shit up

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/07/world/europe/ukraine-russia-zelensky-plot.html


Where was Shoigu?
Member
Posts: 45,945
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 22,189.49
May 8 2024 10:17am
Quote (Djunior @ May 8 2024 03:38am)
Russia annexed Crimea after the Maidan putsch where high ranking Western officials were openly involved and no you cannot possibly compare this to social media trolls promoting Trump SMH

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_annexation_of_Crimea_by_the_Russian_Federation


I still think we've never seen the evidence of how involved the CIA / State was in the Maidan, whether they just co-opted a grassroots movement or tried to provoke it with astroturfing and agitprop or what. And I don't think we'll ever know, its an unknowable, a conspiracy by those who hid their involvement or something that didn't happen. We do know for sure they involved themselves directly in the immediate aftermath and took over the country, which is still the same practical effect so I'm not sure how much it matters to split hairs over western officials being involved with the mob.
Member
Posts: 18,348
Joined: Apr 13 2016
Gold: 127,278.50
May 8 2024 10:28am
Quote (Goomshill @ May 8 2024 05:17pm)
I still think we've never seen the evidence of how involved the CIA / State was in the Maidan, whether they just co-opted a grassroots movement or tried to provoke it with astroturfing and agitprop or what. And I don't think we'll ever know, its an unknowable, a conspiracy by those who hid their involvement or something that didn't happen. We do know for sure they involved themselves directly in the immediate aftermath and took over the country, which is still the same practical effect so I'm not sure how much it matters to split hairs over western officials being involved with the mob.


The CIA took over the country... Do you hear yourself?
Member
Posts: 14,009
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 98,921.50
May 8 2024 11:19am
Quote (Goomshill @ May 8 2024 06:17pm)
I still think we've never seen the evidence of how involved the CIA / State was in the Maidan, whether they just co-opted a grassroots movement or tried to provoke it with astroturfing and agitprop or what. And I don't think we'll ever know, its an unknowable, a conspiracy by those who hid their involvement or something that didn't happen. We do know for sure they involved themselves directly in the immediate aftermath and took over the country, which is still the same practical effect so I'm not sure how much it matters to split hairs over western officials being involved with the mob.


The CIA tries to hide their involvement but Western officials @Maidan definitely didn't. It became 100% clear that the West was pushing for regime change in Ukraine
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1428142824283428442854300Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll