Trump already bombed the white house toilet. No flush.

fuck. I lose. sending.

Protesting =/= rioting. Words are hard. I don't know what Kamala's position on cash bail was before she got in the senate... but while in the senate she has opposed it. It's a pretty standard position for people who support criminal justice reform.

Much of the right believes it... that's how you can justify supporting an evil man, because he fights the evil people on the other side. And it's kind of absurd to think that Kamala supporting rioters makes any sense politically. The riots probably hurt Democrats in the election. And if we assume your talking points are true, that she's supporting the rioters for political reasons, that is immoral behavior. One might even call it evil.

This post was edited by IceMage on Jan 20 2021 09:07am

icepeon sees any minority she/heimmediately thinks they are “poor people”. par for the course for that user

lol’d at the bold

When someone points to the MN riots, and says "let's get these protesters out of jail", they are talking about the MN riots; they are not talking about a high level policy discussion on cash bail. The "protesters" Kamala is referring to went to jail for a myriad of crimes. Assaulting police, arson, torching cars, etc. In simpler times, the word for that was just "riot", but we can hardly expect Kamala Harris to refer to a movement she supports with a word that is synonymous with criminality.

Harris supported the riots because her party supported the riots. Her party supported the riots because it was their activists doing the rioting. To call it a riot would be to undermine what your activists are doing, and so we have had a year now of gaslighting and referring to the riots by increasingly outlandish names, e.g. "fiery but mostly peaceful protests".

You have been dissembling for a few pages now, it's time to put your money where your mouth is.

This is all rubbish. You're taking incorrect assumptions and stacking them together to make baseless arguments. Reminds me of Goom tbh.

Most of these Trumpers argue in bad faith. They have a perverted world view based on narcissism and solipsism and lack decency. It's not even worth making a coherent and logical argument because if you argue with fools, you become the fool.

In all likelihood, you didn't read the tweet before constructing the excuse that Harris wasn't talking about something she was explicitly talking about.

Sometimes we make mistakes.



You've dodged twice now, bud. We are all well aware that you're a light-weight.

This post was edited by bogie160 on Jan 20 2021 10:58am

Nope... someone made this argument months ago.

Taking the effort to dissect your incoherent arguments is a waste of time. I've done it multiple times. It just makes me the fool. You don't have sound arguments.