Quote (bogie160 @ Nov 23 2019 04:00pm)
The Republican party has always been about business, not free market libertarianism. There is another party for that, and it has never been all that successful.
Tariffs are an economic tool, to the extent that they disrupt economic activity, they're bad. To the extent that they protect domestic markets from unfair trade practices, they can be good. French is an absolutist, the free market is always good, therefore tariffs must be bad, irrespective of the fact that they've only been implemented to correct for government sponsored intervention in China and elsewhere.
I suppose so. Republicans deploy the rhetoric of free markets, but in practice they're closer to corporatists.
You're creating a distinction where there isn't one. Any tariff is a tax on economic activity. You can argue it's a good or bad tariff based on whatever goals you think you are going to accomplish, but either way it's disrupting economic activity.
French isn't saying the free market is always good, just that it's better than the alternative. He doesn't have as much faith in technocrats in Washington as others do.
Quote
French thinks Hawley's internet proposal is a government power grab, but the current situation, where a handful of providers dictate content, is hardly better. We've already seen what happens when alternative platforms attempt to disrupt the status quo (e.g. Gab). The dominant oligopolies shut them down. When a market is naturally predisposed towards either monopoly or oligopoly, there is no free market.
It's one thing to talk about dispensing with convenient political fictions, but if we're to pretend that the value of a blue collar hasn't changed, we're embracing one fiction instead of another. This hunky dory, "everything is fine!" belies the reality of the American lower and middle class.
I don't care that much about social media regulation, but Hawley's regulation was full of weird paternalistic nonsense aimed at making these applications less appealing, and therefore, less addictive. I don't want the state telling Twitter how to make their application less convenient.
The last line is a strawman.