If we can amend that to males I’ll be on board.

You are funding an organization that provides elective abortions. I don't see how that isn't considered direct funding.

I get being against the rule itself.

$500 million is 0.5% of a trillion dollar deficit. Try to keep up.

Learn to cunt.
So it's more trivial to say 2000 times... (100/2000 = 0.05)

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Aug 21 2019 01:52pm

Actually, half a percent of a trillion is $5 billion

?
That makes it a privilege but okay




>You support a womans right to choose
>You do not support a womans right to choose when that choice is something that you do not support

its one or the other.

What kind of Bigot are you bro

asking for a friend
?



yes it does. That is what supporting someones right to choose is. Do you have a wife? You might understand what I am saying then, because I or any smart man that wants to not be in the dog house will support his wife regardless of whether or not he likes the decision she makes.

You should try dating women and actually getting to know one before you start spouting rights and priveleg you feel would be best for them lmfao

the pathetic thing is you are trying to type things out and seem smart. lol

This post was edited by IroningTheMaiden on Aug 21 2019 02:23pm

Reasonable restrictions, such as no 3rd trimester abortions mainly. i am not in support of the requirements to see 2 or even 3 doctors that some places have used to restrict abortions. im also not keen on federal funding for abortions, another restriction, but am more flexible based on the details.

you seem to be confused, or maybe it's just the friend who you're asking for that's confused. i support the right to choose, i dont necessarily support the decision. a right is legally bound, a decision is just the exercise of that right, also legally supported, but i dont support it inherently or morally. basically i am for abortion as a legal right, but im also for pairing it with programs that will hopefully reduce the number of abortions that people get. mainly be reducing unwanted pregnancies and improving adoption procedures.

i think you're just caught on the difference between a right legally and the moral implications of exercising that right. i compared it to a legal shooting of an unarmed trespasser, perhaps that comparison was lost on you.



yes i am happily married.

again, i support legally the right for anyone to get an abortion (at least in the first 2 trimesters) in a legal sense. i am not for legislation that would restrict it. that doesnt mean i have to support each instance morally.

the rest of the white knight stuff is honestly just odd. you're confused on a fairly simple point. good luck working through it.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Aug 21 2019 02:27pm

why did it take you three posts and numerous erroneous claims before you were able to clarify yourself

because waht you put there, isnt what you put in the two rpevious essay responses.


Also, you say you support the right.

Then you spend the rest of the posts talking about how you would like it a lot more if it was just a privilege. So if you support the right, then shut up and stop telling me about how much you want it to be restricted and privileged.

This post was edited by IroningTheMaiden on Aug 21 2019 02:29pm

honestly i figure me saying the NBA example would be a breakthrough moment for you. but you then claimed i was persecuting you for your choice, which was odd. it was just a joke.

its simple, i am for people having the right and even making mistakes by exercising it, that doesnt mean i justify it morally. you're the one who made them a package deal.



do you support the 2nd ammendment?

if yes, i'll take my fully auto machine gun with extra large magazine of hollow point armor piercing rounds, plz.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Aug 21 2019 02:30pm

Fortunately, you don't have to worry about these kinds of things Sauceman123