Quote (DeMarcus @ Aug 18 2019 12:00pm)
it did indeed!
where do you pull these facts from? i just showed you exactly why you're wrong. i know numbers and statistics aren't taught in philly curriculum but it gives you no reason to be ignat. jordan has a higher 2pt and 3pt % if you bothered to read the stats you absolute mong.
imagine thinking harden is better than jordan at all. even during an offensive minded league where shooters get benefit of the doubt and favorable calls 24/7 he STILL isn't ahead of jordan in any statline, while jordan played in a defensive centered league. back to the bodega and buy a clue.
You're messing with me, right? This is a troll attempt?
Jordan only had a higher raw FG% because he barely took any threes, meanwhile Harden takes 10+ threes per game. Hence why I used a far more accurate stat, which is True Shooting % and eFG% to account for all of this lol.
"In basketball, true shooting percentage is an APBRmetrics statistic that measures a player's efficiency at shooting the ball.[1] It is intended to more accurately calculate a player's shooting than field goal percentage, free throw percentage, and three-point field goal percentage taken individually. Two- and three-point field goals and free throws are all considered in its calculation."
"In basketball, effective field goal percentage (abbreviated eFG%) is a statistic that adjusts field goal percentage to account for the fact that three-point field goals count for three points while field goals only count for two points. [1] Its goal is to show what field goal percentage a two-point shooter would have to shoot at to match the output of a player who also shoots three-pointers."Check the numbers like I said, Harden beats Jordan (by quite a bit) in both TS% and eFG%. Harden scores just as much, scoring more points per shot, at a higher efficiency, while also distributing the ball better. All facts.
Also, the whole "Jordan played in a defensive minded league" is a fucking joke. The hype about defense back in the day is total BS. Yes, there were some things done differently (some easier and some harder) but to act like Harden couldn't smoke guys back then just like he is now is comical. For one, slow footed big men had a place in the league then. Now, if you don't have incredible foot speed, reaction time and the ability to play above the rim you're probably not going to succeed much unless you're ultra-talented elsewhere as well (i.e. Jokic). Guys adapt, saying Harden wouldn't survive then is like saying Jordan wouldn't survive in todays league because he wasn't a very good outside shooter.
Watch this video (one of the best basketball videos on the internet), or countless other videos. Much like the Jordan brand itself now (which makes people think Jordan is untouchable) the NBA back then wasn't so difficult like people make you to believe...
This post was edited by Sixers on Aug 19 2019 08:38am