In terms of champs
People play meta champs for a reason.
Might be easier to snowball, easier or more damaging combos, more tools to work with, etc.
However the line between meta champs and viable champs isnt that wide.
Thats why "get good" rather than blame champ picks usually is the response.
Cause rarely is it really the champion pick that is holding a person back from climbing
But rather general stuff like (shitty wave management, playing too risky, not warding correctly, etc)
Playing meta champs is a good start, but dont pigeonhole yourself.
Play smart accordingly to vision/enemy jungler pathing, put yourself into situations where you can carry..
In terms of general meta. Pro meta and solo queue are 2 entirely different things lol.
Alot more room for error(less punishment), non-ideal execution, etc.
Quote (PinataParty @ Jun 23 2018 04:42pm)
https://www.reddit.com/r/KassadinMains/comments/8qfuvs/youre_a_troll_if_you_pick_kassadin_apdo/thoughts on this?
"youre a troll if you pick kass" - dopa/apdo
he doesnt even play non-meta champs anymore, or even kass.
also, isnt the meta always "do whats easiest to win" ???
wouldnt any meta be even more drastic in scope for low elo players?
the harder champs like kass for silver noobs becomes even more harder when going against silver talon right?
how can you say meta applies to only the top20 people, when the basis of the meaning meta is purely generalized from the start
Idk about the use of kass in that example.
Kass hasnt been meta for awhile, still hasnt stopped people from climbing pretty well on him,
He has still been very viable in the correct context.
E.G counterpicks into champs like fizz/lb or other control mages; not to mention another side lane split threat.
This post was edited by potentate on Jun 23 2018 06:16pm