d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2016 > Trump Vs Clinton
Prev1292729282929293029313169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,296.69
Apr 16 2019 08:50pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Apr 16 2019 07:49pm)
edgy, charismatic asshole heels have been the most popular brand of character in wrestling for at least 2 decades. Trump quite literally took the concept out of wrestling and into the real world.


same fans
Member
Posts: 51,371
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,400.67
Apr 16 2019 09:05pm
Quote (Beowulf @ 17 Apr 2019 04:50)
same fans


afaik, the fans of wwe skew towards minorities and poor people - both demographics which lean democratic.
Member
Posts: 104,199
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,655.00
Apr 16 2019 09:07pm
Trump vetoes congressional resolution to end U.S. involvement in Yemen war

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-saudi-yemen/trump-vetoes-congressional-resolution-to-end-u-s-involvement-in-yemen-war-idUSKCN1RS2GH

Quote
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Donald Trump has vetoed a congressional resolution that sought to end U.S. involvement in the Saudi-led war in Yemen, the White House said on Tuesday.

“This resolution is an unnecessary, dangerous attempt to weaken my constitutional authorities, endangering the lives of American citizens and brave service members, both today and in the future,” Trump said in the veto message.

The resolution passed the House of Representatives in April and the Senate in March, marking the first time both chambers of Congress had supported a War Powers resolution, which limits the president’s ability to send troops into action.

Neither the 247-175 tally in the Democratic-majority House nor the 54-46 vote in the Republican-led Senate would be enough to override the veto, which would require two-thirds majorities in both chambers.




Congress is upset ofc. They want to be the last word on whether the US goes to or retreats from... war.






/e

In major shift, Trump to allow lawsuits against foreign firms in Cuba

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-cuba/in-major-shift-trump-to-allow-lawsuits-against-foreign-firms-in-cuba-idUSKCN1RS1VY

Quote
he major policy shift, which will be announced on Wednesday, could expose U.S., European and Canadian companies to legal action and deal a blow to Cuba’s efforts to attract more foreign investment. It is also another sign of Washington’s efforts to punish Havana over its support for Venezuela’s socialist president, Nicolas Maduro.

President Donald Trump’s national security adviser, John Bolton, will explain on Wednesday the administration’s decision in a speech in Miami and announce new sanctions on Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua, countries he has branded a “troika of tyranny,” the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

It is unclear, however, whether such property claims will be acceptable in U.S. courts. The European Union has already warned it could lodge a challenge with the World Trade Organization.


Quote
rump threatened in January to allow a law that has been suspended since its creation in 1996, permitting Cuban-Americans and other U.S. citizens to sue foreign companies doing business in Cuba over property seized in decades past by the Cuban government.

Title III of the Helms-Burton Act had been fully waived by every president over the past 23 years due to opposition from the international community and fears it could create chaos in the U.S. court system with a flood of lawsuits.

The complete lifting of the ban could allow billions of dollars in legal claims to move forward in U.S. courts and likely antagonize Canada and Europe, whose companies have significant business holdings in Cuba.

It could also affect some U.S. companies that began investing in the island, an old Cold War foe, since former President Barack Obama began a process of normalizing relations between the two countries from the end of 2014.






This post was edited by Ghot on Apr 16 2019 09:12pm
Member
Posts: 51,371
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,400.67
Apr 16 2019 09:10pm
Quote (Ghot @ 17 Apr 2019 05:07)
Trump vetoes congressional resolution to end U.S. involvement in Yemen war

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-saudi-yemen/trump-vetoes-congressional-resolution-to-end-u-s-involvement-in-yemen-war-idUSKCN1RS2GH

Congress is upset ofc. They want to be the last word on whether the US goes to or retreats from... war.


Constitutionally, Trump is in the right here. But on the issue at hand, Congress is right imho. This war should end asap, and until then, the US should at least stay clear of it.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Apr 16 2019 09:10pm
Member
Posts: 45,937
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 22,189.49
Apr 16 2019 09:28pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Apr 16 2019 09:10pm)
Constitutionally, Trump is in the right here. But on the issue at hand, Congress is right imho. This war should end asap, and until then, the US should at least stay clear of it.


We shouldn't risk our blood and treasure on the KSA's behalf to fight their proxy war for them, but that's no reason to stop supplying them and staying in the air. Crushing the Houthis should be a priority now that ISIS is gone. Its one war we lose nothing from dragging on, theres no troops dying to IEDs, no migrant crisis, just more dead America/Israel/Jew hating Shia radicals

Plus the Saudis being overextended has always geopolitically played to our favor and given us leverage. Why stop the two sides from weakening each other? Israel only exists on the principle of divide and conquer

This post was edited by Goomshill on Apr 16 2019 09:30pm
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Apr 17 2019 07:08am
Member
Posts: 48,590
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 5,016.77
Apr 17 2019 08:20am
Quote (Goomshill @ Apr 16 2019 10:28pm)
We shouldn't risk our blood and treasure on the KSA's behalf to fight their proxy war for them, but that's no reason to stop supplying them and staying in the air. Crushing the Houthis should be a priority now that ISIS is gone. Its one war we lose nothing from dragging on, theres no troops dying to IEDs, no migrant crisis, just more dead America/Israel/Jew hating Shia radicals

Plus the Saudis being overextended has always geopolitically played to our favor and given us leverage. Why stop the two sides from weakening each other? Israel only exists on the principle of divide and conquer


Ah... so we've found the one war that Goom favors US involvement in.

And what a coincidence... it's the only one Trump wants to stay in. :lol:
Member
Posts: 33,563
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,617.52
Apr 17 2019 11:00am
Quote (IceMage @ Apr 17 2019 09:20am)
Ah... so we've found the one war that Goom favors US involvement in.

And what a coincidence... it's the only one Trump wants to stay in. :lol:



Trump cultust exposed !!1!shift+1
Member
Posts: 90,707
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,489.69
Apr 17 2019 11:03am
Quote (Goomshill @ Apr 16 2019 09:28pm)
We shouldn't risk our blood and treasure on the KSA's behalf to fight their proxy war for them, but that's no reason to stop supplying them and staying in the air. Crushing the Houthis should be a priority now that ISIS is gone. Its one war we lose nothing from dragging on, theres no troops dying to IEDs, no migrant crisis, just more dead America/Israel/Jew hating Shia radicals

Plus the Saudis being overextended has always geopolitically played to our favor and given us leverage. Why stop the two sides from weakening each other? Israel only exists on the principle of divide and conquer


is it free? not sarcastic, i'm not sure of the cost/benefit relationship between us and the Saudis in all of this. I would think surveilance and bombing runs are costing us, if we're the ones doing them. but iunno

Quote (Ghot @ Apr 17 2019 11:06am)
Other than minimal surveillance, I thought we were just selling arms to them?


Goom specifically said "stay in the air". which i assumed meant surveillance as well, but didn't know. which is why i said "if we're the ones doing them. but iunno"

admittedly i find the Middle East a dull affair so i hardly read into it.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Apr 17 2019 11:09am
Member
Posts: 104,199
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,655.00
Apr 17 2019 11:06am
Quote (thesnipa @ Apr 17 2019 01:03pm)
is it free? not sarcastic, i'm not sure of the cost/benefit relationship between us and the Saudis in all of this. I would think surveilance and bombing runs are costing us, if we're the ones doing them. but iunno




Other than minimal surveillance, I thought we were just selling arms to them?
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1292729282929293029313169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll