Quote (mainaman @ Mon, May 1 2006, 05:26am)
go duel 125 fcr necros and 200 fcr fb sorc with 20 fcr only gl with that
and the statement that you better use angelic rings and amulet for oponents with more than 7.5k def is true do the calculations if you now how ...
MAKE SURE TO READ CAREFULLY WHAT I SAID:
1)
i use 2 fcr rings with 80+ mana which + arachnid as my pub set up ...this gives me 700+ mana and i asure you its more than enough(i do witch to ravens only if there is cold sors as their fcr isnt high, 20 fcr on my barb is ok)
2)
I use 2 ravens against cold sorc
SHOW ME EXACTLY WHERE IN MY POST I SAID I DONT USE RAVENS AGINST COLD SORC...
and how the hell are you gonna kill energy shield sorc with trand gloves ? your only source of ow will be gores and this is not good enough.
p.s this is direct quote from MCM (if you ever heard of him )
The other thing that has come to light is that using angelics gives better damage on average (taking into account chance to hit) than highlords/ravens for any opponent over 7600 defense,
and if you really want ill do some calculations for you and post so you understand what im talking about.
yawn
1. your pub setup is trash. you wont touch any decent pally with shitty fcr-rings. you are also dead as soon as coldsorc enters game. gg switch more zzzzzzzzzzzzzz?
2.
Quote
and also exactly how you get enough fcr when you use 2 ravens?
so either 20% fcr is enough or it isn't. make up your mind.
last time i checked 105% fcr coldsorcs were faster than 125% fcr necs. make up your mind.
3.
Quote
how the hell are you gonna kill energy shield sorc with trand gloves ?
Quote
also i'd add for pubs its good to use trang gloves
i think you answered yourself. oops?
4. keeping quoting statements that you dont even understand only makes you sound more stupid.
i say again: RAVEN+ANGELIC WILL NEVER DO MORE DAMAGE THAN HIGHLORDS+2X RAVENS. GET IT?
you really have no clue whatsoever about anything. please stop copying random statements to support your garbage theories.
This post was edited by GIFF on May 1 2006 07:30am