Bumper

Yup she would

Turning the frogs gay i tell you

True pretty much just like half the pop

Five G

Hive mind

Synapses being layed out

https://www.bioinitiative.org/

This tells otherwise.

I've personally worked on that subject during my studies, interviewed many people living near high voltage powerlines, electrosensitive person.

This is all facts.

Where it starts being dumb (if you cant prove it) is when you say thoses technologies are developped with eugenic hidden ideas.

Reading I see a lot of "half the papers found some things changed but nothing changed consistently or predictably, and the other half found nothing" This kind of finding is also echoed in the section on neutology and behavior. This is exactly what we expect if there is no trend and it was present in every section I looked at.

The section on genotoxicity even says as much since its a 50/50 between measuring an effect and not in published studies.

Overall this is WAAAAAY too broad to be useful, and even so the findings in each section are inconsistent.

Its a nice repository of references but its definitely not proof of any negative effects. If anything it shows how it doesnt have consistent negative effects since they are so hard to get a consistent measurement.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Jan 6 2019 04:12pm

its because they dilute the misinformation to make it seem like its aye-O-KaY ^^

but it aint, i see it



straight facts

I mean, I read several sections and none of them supported a strong link between EM and health effects. Every section I read basically said "Half of papers don't show a connection, half do but not in any consistent way". Even then its been criticized for giving equal weight to all studies despite the varying quality of evidence.

So if you want to support your argument that's not a good source even if you take it at face value.