Quote (ozzyarmy3 @ Feb 4 2024 01:00pm)
So I take it that you can't decipher quality vs poor quality papers?
There's lots of tools out there if you're interested. Start with the type of study that's being conducted, do a quick google search on "systematic reviews to assess quality of studies", it should give you an exhaustive list to use and apply these tools to the study.
It'll truly open your mind.
E: an example of this is Tears linking a 'platform' created by a non-fiction thriller author. You cannot tout what he says or offers as truth when literal scientist and researchers are giving objective data that suggests the efficacy and safety of the COVID-19 vaccine is inherently safer than the alternative.
e again: I still love you, Tears.
All good.
His articles should cite all the scientific data. He’s the only person to sue twitter in Supreme Court and win over factual information regarding Covid and the vaccines. Where several “experts” failed to dispute the science he was just quoting and sharing.
I find that hard to refute.
Unknown causes and the real fauci (both good books) have had multi million dollar bounty’s on them to dispute open to anyone who can, and yet no one’s claimed the prize.
I’m not as educated (not even close) to the level you are. But I don’t think it takes someone educated to understand how corrupt government and big pharma , and mainstream media are. They’re all in bed together financially it doesn’t take a genius to know they don’t tell the truth.