The majority of your suggestion is already accomplishable via the csv export feature that Njaguar implemented already.

The other part with "marking" something as a donation is redundant and unnecessary. The comment part of the is all you need to mark something as a donation and is much more robust.

Voted no.

My suggestion allows you to directly manage your transfers and find your way around easily.

You're confusing with archiving, that's not the goal here.

Bump

It's all an interesting idea but I'm unsure if d2jsp.org is ready/designed for a designated "donation" tab that is universal between all users.

It will not change anything for the users, apart from bringing them comfort, better visibility, management of their fg transfer.
It will also provide the d2jsp team with better visibility and control of transfers between members, which can sometimes be questionable and difficult to investigate.
I see only positive in this proposal.
As for the changes, I'll let the admins decide if they would be willing to do it. In any case, these are minor modifications.

Thanks for sharing your point of view.

Just my opinion here.

Adding a donation tab would increase the amount of users interested in donations. How that would change d2jsp.org for a user experience could be positive and or negative.

Adding a donation tab to the fg page may also make users want to "be nicer" which could decrease the competitive trading and therefore "value" of fg on a global scale.

For both, I'm not sure.

People already donate for a reason: mainly between friends, or to thank someone for anything. Donations don't happen like that for no reason. That's why I don't think it will change things much.
On the contrary, it will give a flexibility and better management to a system that already existed before, and it will delight people who already do it.

On the point where it can help people want to be better, I don't see the problem with that
Those whose intention is false, will simply not continue. And so it won't affect the d2jsp system like you think.

Bump

Bump

Okay. I think the time you and put into this is was very neat. The concept and ideas are definitely useful for some people but after further consideration I leave you with this.

I think the general change you suggested has already been addressed.



Voted no