I don’t get why you’re so abrupt with this.
I stated in my post (did you read it? Or just see the no answer and get mad?) that I had the option to turn off signatures. Pretty sure we all know that option. So this was abit rude.

If this is something you really want.. don’t let a few no’s, put you off or make you angry.
You’ve just got to be open to all opinions. Good luck

Im opened thats why i created poll,

And now i just get infos that this signature size was already denied in past and will never happen.
And arguments about data are nonsense, sorry.

Nevermind

Have a good day and forget this poll, it will never happen again.
(Atleast from me for sure )

This post was edited by Hamm on Jan 24 2020 12:45pm

Why not
would only be used by small portion of ppl anyway
mobile data should be good enaugh to handle a bit more kb per signature just fine

only voting yes if animated sigs become banned
...they’re really ugly, and I doubt 150kb would be enough to have good picture quality AND animations

Agree 100%
So many things on this site is outdated for 2020

Voted yes



cool

This.

I even disabled signs and avatars.

Personally I'd be most in favor of disallowing images in signatures altogether.
But then again, that's just my opinion -- and it's the reason why I have signatures disabled in my settings. The outcome of this poll won't affect me...

I just want to share: I'd be 100% against making this an option for paying members, simply because signature size only affects the client-side of the website, and has absolutely no impact on the server load (whether it be bandwidth, disk usage or processing power). Either make it an option for everyone or for no-one.

When they can disable images and signatures in settings to save data

Its not any argument, they just have to say No for any reason..and allways to show something.

Thx.



Thx.

This post was edited by Hamm on Jan 26 2020 08:00am