d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Democrat Division Megathread
Prev19495969798205Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 93,011
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,214.94
Nov 4 2019 10:00am
Quote (Goomshill @ Nov 4 2019 10:19am)
https://twitter.com/PolishPatriotTM/status/1191321758210633731

you had ONE JOB JOE
don't do it don't do it don-
oh for fucks sake joe


equal opportunity child molester i spose. at least he kissed the boy and the girl was only subjected to the creepy secret whisper.
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Nov 4 2019 10:14am
Quote (IceMage @ 4 Nov 2019 09:11)


Quote (Goomshill @ 4 Nov 2019 10:19)
https://twitter.com/PolishPatriotTM/status/1191321758210633731

you had ONE JOB JOE
don't do it don't do it don-
oh for fucks sake joe


lmao
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Nov 4 2019 11:45am
Quote (IceMage @ 4 Nov 2019 15:11)


wait, if you go by establishment media, you should always have been on the biden train - so why are you 'back'? they've been pushing him and discrediting sanders (and warren to a lesser degree as well) all along...
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Nov 4 2019 11:57am
Quote (fender @ Nov 4 2019 11:45am)
wait, if you go by establishment media, you should always have been on the biden train - so why are you 'back'? they've been pushing him and discrediting sanders (and warren to a lesser degree as well) all along...


What does "go by establishment media" mean? Accept all uncritically?
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Nov 4 2019 12:10pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ 4 Nov 2019 18:57)
What does "go by establishment media" mean? Accept all uncritically?


it means that if that particular NY times article "convinced" someone that biden is the right choice for democrats, they should never have had a different opinion, because biden has been msm's guy since before he even announced his candidacy.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Nov 4 2019 12:29pm
Quote (fender @ Nov 4 2019 12:10pm)
it means that if that particular NY times article "convinced" someone that biden is the right choice for democrats, they should never have had a different opinion, because biden has been msm's guy since before he even announced his candidacy.


Only if you assume that they give equal weight to every New York Times article and every fact in each article
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Nov 4 2019 01:00pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ 4 Nov 2019 19:29)
Only if you assume that they give equal weight to every New York Times article and every fact in each article


only if you assume there were ny times articles that made reasonably convincing arguments to support other candidates over biden.
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Nov 4 2019 01:06pm
*joe biden sniffs ppl's hair

cult: "child molester" - what a creep - this guy can't be president! (agreed btw)

*trump barges into teenage girls dressing room to see them naked / has sex with porn stars while his wife is pregnant / grabs women by the pussy / sex parties with kiddy fiddler epstein / countless creepy comments and photos with his own daughter...

cult: *crickets*
Member
Posts: 54,204
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Nov 4 2019 01:38pm
Quote (fender @ 4 Nov 2019 19:10)
it means that if that particular NY times article "convinced" someone that biden is the right choice for democrats, they should never have had a different opinion, because biden has been msm's guy since before he even announced his candidacy.


This ny times articles provided cold hard data to support the argument that Biden is more electable than Warren. It's perfectly reasonable to find this more convincing than opinion articles from NY based journalists who clearly have a harder time staying in touch with the pulse of middle america, or the six battleground states in question.

Quote (fender @ 4 Nov 2019 20:06)
*joe biden sniffs ppl's hair

cult: "child molester" - what a creep - this guy can't be president! (agreed btw)

*trump barges into teenage girls dressing room to see them naked / has sex with porn stars while his wife is pregnant / grabs women by the pussy / sex parties with kiddy fiddler epstein / countless creepy comments and photos with his own daughter...

cult: *crickets*


You're missing the key point: the parties, and their voters, dont hold themselves to the same standard. Trump is running for the "boys gonna be boys"-party while Biden is running for the party of #metoo-hysteria. It is the Democrats and their voters who consider themselves to be morally superior to the Republicans.

The Dems have set a higher moral standard for themselves, deliberately to distinguish themselves from the Republicans and all the "deplorables". Do you really think it is unfair if we hold the Dems to this standard that they have set for themselves?

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Nov 4 2019 01:40pm
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Nov 4 2019 01:56pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 4 Nov 2019 20:38)
You're missing the key point: the parties, and their voters, dont hold themselves to the same standard. Trump is running for the "boys gonna be boys"-party while Biden is running for the party of #metoo-hysteria. It is the Democrats and their voters who consider themselves to be morally superior to the Republicans.

The Dems have set a higher moral standard for themselves, deliberately to distinguish themselves from the Republicans and all the "deplorables". Do you really think it is unfair if we hold the Dems to this standard that they have set for themselves?


holy fuck... if shitty excuses could fly, you'd be an international airport. you might think that embracing your massive double standards was a great defence, but it really isn't.
the people who were calling biden a 'creep' (rightfully so) and even a 'child molester' for smelling ppl's heads are not saying 'DEMS can't support him because of THEIR standards', they are (again, justifiably) pointing out his creepy his behaviour. however, and that's the massive hypocrisy i'm criticising, they also act like the objectively much worse things that trump did are somehow completely irrelevant.

that said, what you appeasingly call the 'boys will be boys' party, officially labels itself the party of 'family values' and 'christian conservatism'. the 'boys will be boys / just locker room talk' excuse is only ever made to downplay trump's (a 73 year old 'boy') disgusting behaviour - when he speaks to bible huggers, he pretends to be one of them - and you can't tell me that every republican voter is simply too stupid to see who he really is. also, a grown ass man invading teenage girls dressing rooms and making comments about dating his daughter is pretty fucking disgusting, even IF you assume a 'boys will be boys' attitude.

This post was edited by fender on Nov 4 2019 01:56pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev19495969798205Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll