d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Pelosi Expected To Announce Trump Impeachment > Proceedings Soon.
Prev17891011139Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 54,118
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Sep 25 2019 12:19pm
Quote (thundercock @ 25 Sep 2019 18:59)
So did anyone read the transcript? It seemed like gay porn with how much they were felating each other LOL


was about to say. my god did zelensky suck trumps dick in that conversation. :ph34r:


about the part where trump asks him to open up the investigation into Biden's son: it all comes down to the premise:
if the premise is that Hunter Biden's actions in Ukraine in 2014 were at least shady, but never properly investigated because the previous government were deep down Obama's ass, then it is perfectly fair for Trump to call for an open-ended investigation according to Ukrainian laws.
if the premise is that Hunter Biden did nothing wrong and that there also isnt probable cause for such an investigation, then Trump asking for such an investigation would be a corrupt act (asking a foreign leader to bend or break the laws of his own country to do Trump a political favor).



at the end of the day, the phone call leaves enough room for both interpretations; and in either case, it definitely is NOT the smoking gun the Democrats were hoping for and would have needed to really get anywhere with their impeachment proceedings.

tldr: this whole thing will die in the partisan quagmire, imho without moving the needle too much in either direction.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Sep 25 2019 12:20pm
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Sep 25 2019 12:22pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Sep 25 2019 11:19am)
was about to say. my god did zelensky suck trumps dick in that conversation. :ph34r:


about the part where trump asks him to open up the investigation into Biden's son: it all comes down to the premise:
if the premise is that Hunter Biden's actions in Ukraine in 2014 were at least shady, but never properly investigated because the previous government were deep down Obama's ass, then it is perfectly fair for Trump to call for an open-ended investigation according to Ukrainian laws.
if the premise is that Hunter Biden did nothing wrong and that there also isnt probable cause for such an investigation, then Trump asking for such an investigation would be a corrupt act (asking a foreign leader to bend or break the laws of his own country to do Trump a political favor).



at the end of the day, the phone call leaves enough room for both interpretations; and in either case, it definitely is NOT the smoking gun the Democrats were hoping for and would have needed to really get anywhere with their impeachment proceedings.

tldr: this whole thing will die in the partisan quagmire, imho without moving the needle too much in either direction.


It definitely warrants an investigation though, that's the point.
Member
Posts: 10,060
Joined: Mar 30 2010
Gold: 10,779.02
Sep 25 2019 12:29pm
Quote (thundercock @ Sep 25 2019 01:22pm)
It definitely warrants an investigation though, that's the point.


Nearly everything warrants an investigation these days. That's the new trendy polotical smear - which is a really dangerous thing.

It seems like everyone just wants their opponent under investigation (doesn't matter for what) and then scream and shout about it.

Investigate away.... and if you find ACTUAL proof that Trump strong armed a foreign leader to sack Biden we'll start looking for a place to set up the Guillotine.

E: and hereeeeee weeeeeee gooooooo (Joker voice)

https://www.yahoo.com/news/why-transcript-trumps-ukraine-call-155755710.html

This post was edited by djman72 on Sep 25 2019 12:31pm
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 25 2019 12:33pm
Quote (djman72 @ Sep 25 2019 01:29pm)
Nearly everything warrants an investigation these days. That's the new trendy polotical smear - which is a really dangerous thing.

It seems like everyone just wants their opponent under investigation (doesn't matter for what) and then scream and shout about it.

Investigate away.... and if you find ACTUAL proof that Trump strong armed a foreign leader to sack Biden we'll start looking for a place to set up the Guillotine.

E: and hereeeeee weeeeeee gooooooo (Joker voice)

https://www.yahoo.com/news/why-transcript-trumps-ukraine-call-155755710.html


I don't think there's a single person here that thinks you or any other Trump supporter on this forum would stop defending Trump regardless of whatever evidence comes out.
Member
Posts: 92,962
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Sep 25 2019 12:35pm
Quote (thundercock @ Sep 25 2019 01:19pm)
The fact that Rudy is involved in ANY way is pretty bad. I don't know if it's illegal or not, but using your personal attorney to work with a foreign government in order to investigate a possible opponent is a REALLY bad look. If Trump wants to pretend to be fighting "corruption," he should have ONLY involved the justice department (which he said he would do). Unfortunately, the DOJ said they were never contacted.


It;s muddy water but Rudy isn't strictly Trump's personal lawyer, he's also an official adviser. his position is kind of a sham, his focus is supposed to be cyber security but he doesnt actually deal with that at all. however, he is still an official member of the Trump administration.

now, how that plays legally with regards to Trump having advisers who don't hold an actual office lobbying foreign nationals, idk. to be honest i dont know if there's much relevant precedent on the matter.

Quote (Thor123422 @ Sep 25 2019 01:33pm)
I don't think there's a single person here that thinks you or any other Trump supporter on this forum would stop defending Trump regardless of whatever evidence comes out.


you dumb dumbs can keep repeating this line 100000000x through djman and many others admitting time and again when Trump does wrong things, just makes you all look really stupid while circle jerking tbh.

the whole "trump cultists will never admit he did anything wrong" schtick in pard is low IQ. try harder, you all sound like idiots.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Sep 25 2019 12:36pm
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Sep 25 2019 12:39pm
Quote (djman72 @ 25 Sep 2019 18:18)
Yes, i don't except the washington post or the huffington post as objective sources.

Objective sources you claim are abundant.

You provide nothing but strawman garbage. Exposed again.


it's 'accept' - you can't even copy it correctly from a foreign speaker, smh...


read the transcript:

"I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. [...] United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn't say that it's reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine."

"There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great."

"I will have Mr. Giuliani give you a call and I am also going to have Attorney General Barr call and we will get to the bottom of it. I'm sure you will figure it out. I heard the prosecutor was treated very badly and he was a very fair prosecutor so good luck with everything. Your economy is going to get better and better I predict."


if you read that with the knowledge that trump withheld $400 million in military aid prior to the call, you'd have to be delusional not to realise what's going on there. but hey, it's the same as with the blatantly racist stuff he has done throughout his life and during his presidency: it doesn't matter how obvious it is, his braindead followers will always claim 'it's fine, nothing to see here, this is perfectly normal'...
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Sep 25 2019 01:09pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ 25 Sep 2019 14:33)
I don't think there's a single person here that thinks you or any other Trump supporter on this forum would stop defending Trump regardless of whatever evidence comes out.

no one care what a pale pasty privileged lefty who got intellectually bamboozled by flat earther thinks

stick to denying math and licking petri-dishes in your tiny little lab in the middle of nowhere lmfao, pathetic..

Quote (djman72 @ 25 Sep 2019 14:29)
Nearly everything warrants an investigation these days. That's the new trendy polotical smear - which is a really dangerous thing.

It seems like everyone just wants their opponent under investigation (doesn't matter for what) and then scream and shout about it.

Investigate away.... and if you find ACTUAL proof that Trump strong armed a foreign leader to sack Biden we'll start looking for a place to set up the Guillotine.

E: and hereeeeee weeeeeee gooooooo (Joker voice)

https://www.yahoo.com/news/why-transcript-trumps-ukraine-call-155755710.html

lmao now they’re denying the transcript they demanded

This post was edited by excellence on Sep 25 2019 01:13pm
Member
Posts: 10,060
Joined: Mar 30 2010
Gold: 10,779.02
Sep 25 2019 01:12pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Sep 25 2019 01:33pm)
I don't think there's a single person here that thinks you or any other Trump supporter on this forum would stop defending Trump regardless of whatever evidence comes out.


As i've mentioned countless times to the shills, i did not vote for Trump. He's a very flawed president and i'm basically for anyone who runs against democrats because i actually enjoy this country.

Hard to get past that comfortable notion that anyone who disagrees with you a (insert Trump verb).

Quote (fender @ Sep 25 2019 01:39pm)
it's 'accept' - you can't even copy it correctly from a foreign speaker, smh...


read the transcript:

"I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. [...] United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn't say that it's reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine."

"There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great."

"I will have Mr. Giuliani give you a call and I am also going to have Attorney General Barr call and we will get to the bottom of it. I'm sure you will figure it out. I heard the prosecutor was treated very badly and he was a very fair prosecutor so good luck with everything. Your economy is going to get better and better I predict."


if you read that with the knowledge that trump withheld $400 million in military aid prior to the call, you'd have to be delusional not to realise what's going on there. but hey, it's the same as with the blatantly racist stuff he has done throughout his life and during his presidency: it doesn't matter how obvious it is, his braindead followers will always claim 'it's fine, nothing to see here, this is perfectly normal'...


You caught me on the grammar, friend. You win!

The bold is not proof of legal wrong doing. I'll give you a wink and a nod, but you can't impeach on that buddy.

I forget..... were you so zealous when Obama told Putin he'll have more flexibility after the elections? Should he have been impeached after that?

I'll wait.

E: i'm also open to your explanation on how the two are different - since they're both up for interpretation.

This post was edited by djman72 on Sep 25 2019 01:13pm
Member
Posts: 92,962
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Sep 25 2019 01:14pm
fender: "you cultists will never admit ANYTHING your leader does is wrong, EVER"

basically everyone: "yeah doesnt look good, not sure if it's impeachable"

fender: "you're all shifting the goalposts to impeachment, you can't ever admit he has EVER done anything wrong, EVER"

basically everyone: "dude slow down, we've posted multiple times it looks shady but just wont stand up in impeachment and no apparent crime is there"

fender: "wHy cAnT yOu sAy hE dId wRoNg"

around and around and around.
Member
Posts: 50,167
Joined: Mar 19 2006
Gold: 4,071.19
Sep 25 2019 01:35pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev17891011139Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll