d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Pelosi Expected To Announce Trump Impeachment > Proceedings Soon.
Prev16061626364139Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Oct 4 2019 01:09pm
Quote (Landmine @ 4 Oct 2019 14:46)
You are the cult


Quote (IgoSoHard @ 4 Oct 2019 14:53)
If by a “good faith effort”, you mean she clearly lied about almost every possible facet of it, then sure. Grade A effort there, sport.

In actuality almost everyone agrees she very clearly fucked up, then lied about in an attempt to cover it up. Do I think she deserved to go to prison for this ? No, I don’t. It’s not that serious. I would feel the same way if it was Trump. I don’t think you can say the same thing.

It’s both ironic & funny, you’re doing the exact same thing towards this situation, as you claim supporters of Trump to for him.

There were clearly some poor decisions made, things you aren’t supposed to do...but in your opinion no law was broken, so it’s not a crime, so it’s not a big deal.

Then you turn around & call people cultists for applying the same logic to Trump.

You fail to see this because you have your TDS blinders on 24/7.

You also conflate every person who voted for Trump to be on Ghot’s level. No offense Ghot, but you know what it is.


Quote (bogie160 @ 4 Oct 2019 14:52)
Do you believe her when she says she doesn't know what the "C" meant, too?

Come on, this is embarrassing.


icepeon is a shameless creature.

he openly admits to being a snarky privileged lefty and will vote for any (D) or socialist candidate for the next few elections, even if they nominate the corpse of robert byrd (who was in the kkk, filibustered the civil rights act and was Hillary clinton’s mentor) or the corpse of teddy kennedy (actually conspired with a communist regime to rig an election, and this is after killing a woman by leaving her to suffocate in a submerged car)

This post was edited by excellence on Oct 4 2019 01:10pm
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Oct 4 2019 01:10pm
Quote (IgoSoHard @ Oct 4 2019 02:53pm)
If by a “good faith effort”, you mean she clearly lied about almost every possible facet of it, then sure. Grade A effort there, sport.

In actuality almost everyone agrees she very clearly fucked up, then lied about in an attempt to cover it up. Do I think she deserved to go to prison for this ? No, I don’t. It’s not that serious. I would feel the same way if it was Trump. I don’t think you can say the same thing.

It’s both ironic & funny, you’re doing the exact same thing towards this situation, as you claim supporters of Trump to for him.

There were clearly some poor decisions made, things you aren’t supposed to do...but in your opinion no law was broken, so it’s not a crime, so it’s not a big deal.

Then you turn around & call people cultists for applying the same logic to Trump.

You fail to see this because you have your TDS blinders on 24/7.

You also conflate every person who voted for Trump to be on Ghot’s level. No offense Ghot, but you know what it is.


The 1st bold is not what I've argued.

Plasma started this by claiming Hillary and her staff should go to jail concerning the email thing, and he mentions hammering devices. I brought up the fact that having her staff go through her emails and delete the personal ones is not illegal. If they mistakenly deleted some which could be considered work related(like Sidney Blumenthal stuff), that would be tough for DOJ to prosecute. You'd have to show some intent to hide evidence. Frankly, Hillary's somewhat understandable desire to cover her own ass has caused more issues than just being transparent.

So I'm just focusing on the narrow question of a crime considering the 33,000 emails getting deleted. I'm not defending everything Hillary did regarding the server and/or emails. It is fun to be the only person on PaRD who will defend Hillary at all though. :thumbsup:

LMAO @ 2nd bold.

This post was edited by IceMage on Oct 4 2019 01:11pm
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Oct 4 2019 01:25pm
Quote (excellence @ Oct 4 2019 03:09pm)
icepeon is a shameless creature.

he openly admits to being a snarky privileged lefty and will vote for any (D) or socialist candidate for the next few elections, even if they nominate the corpse of robert byrd (who was in the kkk, filibustered the civil rights act and was Hillary clinton’s mentor) or the corpse of teddy kennedy (actually conspired with a communist regime to rig an election, and this is after killing a woman by leaving her to suffocate in a submerged car)


Says the guy who has to hide behind boring, weak trolling because you don't have the intellect to participate in debate.
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Oct 4 2019 01:27pm
Quote (IceMage @ 4 Oct 2019 15:25)
Says the guy who has to hide behind boring, weak trolling because you don't have the intellect to participate in debate.

you’ve been denying basic math for three years. not my fault your privilege can’t overcompensate for your inefficiencies
Member
Posts: 105,134
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Oct 4 2019 01:36pm






Member
Posts: 50,806
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,846.00
Oct 4 2019 02:03pm
so back to my thought experiment nobody satisfactorily answered;

Quote
Donald Trump walks into Khreshchatyk street in Kiev, and shoots someone to death in cold blood.
Nancy Pelosi then says "Ukraine should investigate Trump for the murder we just saw him commit!"
Should Nancy Pelosi then be removed from office and imprisoned for the crime of soliciting an illegal campaign contribution from a foreign government?


And to take that a step further-
note that there's no distinction in the statute between the actions of candidates and private citizens in the statutes
If ^Excellence says that Ukraine should investigate Biden, does that constitute an illegal solicitation of foreign campaign donations?
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Oct 4 2019 02:07pm
Anyway, back on topic. Volker(former special envoy to Ukraine) had a deposition yesterday. Some text messages were released:

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/10/04/us/politics/ukraine-text-messages-volker.html

It does appear correct(which is hard to believe) that the Ukrainians didn't know the aid was on hold until a month after the Trump Zelensky call(also worth remembering aid was held by Trump's orders, not state/defense/natsec council). Although the texts reveal diplomats trying to get the Ukrainian president to announce investigations into supposed 2016 election interference and Burisma in exchange for a meeting with Trump.

Couple notable quotes:

For context, Sondland is ambassador to the EU(and a guy who donated 1 mil to Trump inaguration fund), Bill Taylor is the top diplomat in Ukraine and used to be ambassador under W Bush.

Quote
On September 1, Ambassador Taylor sought clarification of the requirements for a White House visit:

[9/1/19, 12:08:57 PM] Bill Taylor: Are we now saying that security assistance and WH meeting are conditioned on investigations?

[9/1/19, 12:42:29 PM] Gordon Sondland: Call me


Quote
State Department Officials on Withholding Security Assistance: On September 9, 2019, Ambassador Taylor and Ambassador Sondland had the following exchange regarding the withholding of military assistance to Ukraine:

[9/9/19, 12:31:06 AM] Bill Taylor: The message to the Ukrainians (and Russians) we send with the decision on security assistance is key. With the hold, we have already shaken their faith in us. Thus my nightmare scenario.

[9/9/19, 12:34:44 AM] Bill Taylor: Counting on you to be right about this interview, Gordon.

[9/9/19, 12:37:16 AM] Gordon Sondland: Bill, I never said I was “right”. I said we are where we are and believe we have identified the best pathway forward. Lets hope it works.

[9/9/19, 12:47:11 AM] Bill Taylor: As I said on the phone, I think it’s crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign.

[9/9/19, 5:19:35 AM] Gordon Sondland: Bill, I believe you are incorrect about President Trump’s intentions. The President has been crystal clear no quid pro quo’s of any kind. The President is trying to evaluate whether Ukraine is truly going to adopt the transparency and reforms that President Zelensky promised during his campaign I suggest we stop the back and forth by text If you still have concerns I recommend you give Lisa Kenna or S a call to discuss them directly. Thanks.


This post was edited by IceMage on Oct 4 2019 02:11pm
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 4 2019 02:11pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Oct 4 2019 03:03pm)
so back to my thought experiment nobody satisfactorily answered;

And to take that a step further-
note that there's no distinction in the statute between the actions of candidates and private citizens in the statutes
If ^Excellence says that Ukraine should investigate Biden, does that constitute an illegal solicitation of foreign campaign donations?


Did she engage in a quid pro quo to investigate him only after Trump became an opponent in the election?

Because the whole withholding military aid to force his hand is kind of a big part of this.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Oct 4 2019 02:11pm
Member
Posts: 50,806
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,846.00
Oct 4 2019 02:17pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Oct 4 2019 03:11pm)
Did she engage in a quid pro quo to investigate him only after Trump became an opponent in the election?

Because the whole withholding military aid to force his hand is kind of a big part of this.


Did Trump?
Sure seems like;
Quote
The President has been crystal clear no quid pro quo’s of any kind.


Remember, the national narrative has already bounced around on 'quid pro quo' several times and democrats have made it clear they're going ahead with impeachment with or without any quid pro quo, saying merely asking is enough- and that Trump has committed 'more impeachable offenses' when he talked about China and Ukraine again yesterday. So for the sake of this thought experiment, I'd say quid pro quo isn't material.
Besides, on the "thing of value" absurd misreading of the campaign finance statute they're trying to torture into a law in a way that would make Beria blush, its definitely immaterial whether its coerced

This post was edited by Goomshill on Oct 4 2019 02:18pm
Member
Posts: 10,594
Joined: Dec 6 2016
Gold: 8.73
Oct 4 2019 02:23pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Oct 4 2019 04:03pm)
so back to my thought experiment nobody satisfactorily answered;



And to take that a step further-
note that there's no distinction in the statute between the actions of candidates and private citizens in the statutes
If ^Excellence says that Ukraine should investigate Biden, does that constitute an illegal solicitation of foreign campaign donations?


You're missing the point.

The request to investigate is unpleasant but not the part anyone cares about. He's leveraging taxpayer money to further his political campaign. I feel like he's been doing this petty shit on purpose but I can't figure out why someone would spend so much time pretending to be retarded. Maybe excellence can shed some light on that since he's got experience
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev16061626364139Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll