d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Pelosi Expected To Announce Trump Impeachment > Proceedings Soon.
Prev14344454647139Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 61,687
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 28.77
Oct 2 2019 12:48pm
Quote (thundercock @ Oct 2 2019 11:40am)
After all other channels were exhausted, sure. The House is a partisan entity so if you want to appear non-partisan, you should go through the correct channels first.


If someone had dirt on Schiff and they brought it directly to Donald Trump Goomy and all of his ilk would be totally OK with it. They give zero fucks about anything except "owning the libs." So why should the libs give zero fucks?

This post was edited by inkanddagger on Oct 2 2019 12:48pm
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Oct 2 2019 12:50pm
Quote (inkanddagger @ Oct 2 2019 11:48am)
If someone had dirt on Schiff and they brought it directly to Donald Trump Goomy and all of his ilk would be totally OK with it. They give zero fucks about anything except "owning the libs." So why should the libs give zero fucks?


Because someone has to be the adult in the room.
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Oct 2 2019 01:01pm
we are still waiting for Schiff’s compelling information about russia collusion that he and only he has.

not sure why he gets to obstruct justice in such a manner

This post was edited by excellence on Oct 2 2019 01:01pm
Member
Posts: 40,852
Joined: Sep 17 2011
Gold: 0.00
Oct 2 2019 01:02pm
Trump DARVOing hard.

These tweets are comedy gold.
Member
Posts: 50,823
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,846.00
Oct 2 2019 01:13pm
Quote (thundercock @ Oct 2 2019 01:35pm)
Didn't the whistleblower go through two separate channels? The whistleblowing as well as the CIA's legal counsel?

You're making it seem like the whistleblower went to Schiff when it was the CIA's legal counsel who did..


read again:

Quote
The C.I.A. officer approached a House Intelligence Committee aide with his concerns about Mr. Trump only after he had had a colleague first convey them to the C.I.A.’s top lawyer. Concerned about how that initial avenue for airing his allegations through the C.I.A. was unfolding, the officer then approached the House aide. In both cases, the original accusation was vague.

The House staff member, following the committee’s procedures, suggested the officer find a lawyer to advise him and file a whistle-blower complaint. The aide shared some of what the officer conveyed to Mr. Schiff. The aide did not share the whistle-blower’s identity with Mr. Schiff, an official said.


This is the important bit.
The CIA officer went to the CIA counsel first, but he also went to Adam Schiff's office- not the CIA counsel, the whistleblower did it, he's the "officer" here- and then Schiff's office directed him to get a lawyer and file the whistleblower complaint.
Or in other words, the house democrats helped orchestrate this, setting up the very whistleblower complaint that they then cited as cause to open impeachment proceedings without identifying their own role in setting it up.
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Oct 2 2019 01:14pm
Quote (kalelvszod @ Oct 2 2019 01:33pm)
I thought he just said he was gonna hunt them down? Not really a threat. Can find out who it is and fire them which probably has legal grounds.


He said he was going to hunt them down. That is a threat genius lol.
Member
Posts: 15,467
Joined: Sep 15 2007
Gold: 475.46
Oct 2 2019 01:14pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Oct 2 2019 01:13pm)
read again:



This is the important bit.
The CIA officer went to the CIA counsel first, but he also went to Adam Schiff's office- not the CIA counsel, the whistleblower did it, he's the "officer" here- and then Schiff's office directed him to get a lawyer and file the whistleblower complaint.
Or in other words, the house democrats helped orchestrate this, setting up the very whistleblower complaint that they then cited as cause to open impeachment proceedings without identifying their own role in setting it up.


Did the president try to withhold money for help with his campaign?
Member
Posts: 50,823
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,846.00
Oct 2 2019 01:17pm
Quote (Brian_D @ Oct 2 2019 02:14pm)
Did the president try to withhold money for help with his campaign?


No, he did not, that accusation has been pretty thoroughly debunked at this point, showing the whistleblower's ignorance when using only second-hand information.
Leaving democrats with the thin pretense that Trump's impeachable offense was politely asking the Ukrainians to look into Joe/Hunter Biden's story
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Oct 2 2019 01:21pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Oct 2 2019 12:13pm)
read again:



This is the important bit.
The CIA officer went to the CIA counsel first, but he also went to Adam Schiff's office- not the CIA counsel, the whistleblower did it, he's the "officer" here- and then Schiff's office directed him to get a lawyer and file the whistleblower complaint.
Or in other words, the house democrats helped orchestrate this, setting up the very whistleblower complaint that they then cited as cause to open impeachment proceedings without identifying their own role in setting it up.


Oh sorry, you're right, I misread that.

Yes, it seems that democrat aids assisted with pointing him in the right direction. What's wrong with that if it's standard operating procedure?
Member
Posts: 50,823
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,846.00
Oct 2 2019 01:28pm
Quote (thundercock @ Oct 2 2019 02:21pm)
Oh sorry, you're right, I misread that.

Yes, it seems that democrat aids assisted with pointing him in the right direction. What's wrong with that if it's standard operating procedure?


The part where having a whistleblower complaint in the first place seems to be Adam Schiff's idea
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev14344454647139Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll