I heard that's all sorted because Biden is an old man without a brain so he can't be held responsible

Lalalalalalalala lol

Literally from the doj, they will not pursue charges because a jury will feel bad for him, not being able to remember anything or project complete thoughts.

when it was revealed the Steele Dossier derived from Russia it was considered instantly void. untouchable. can't even consider things on a case by case basis factually. its just all fake now.

this comes from Russia and Jim Jordan says "the fundamental facts of the case haven't changed".

clown world. Putin with an economy the size of Italy gets the USA to commit to cold war 2.0 and tank our own country for Ukraine, then plays us like a fiddle using gmail.

Putin really owns the USA politically.

the country isnt tanking

1 bil there, 400m here

not going to tank the country lol



Its not putin its the russian operatives within the Republican party that are fucking everything

The question re: the dossier was whether it was real. I.e. Did Russian intelligence have kompromat on Trump in the form of pee tapes? The answer was no, and that the allegations were sourced disinfo from the Clinton campaign. It wouldn't have been exonerating to say "Yes, Trump did piss on prostitutes but it doesn't matter because its Russian intelligence."

The question now is whether Hunter and James Biden received millions of dollars from some of the most corrupt actors in some of the most corrupt places in earth in exchange for political influence, and whether Joe was involved. The first half of that question is unequivocally "yes". The second half looks incredibly damning given how money received from said ventures flowed freely within the Biden family. The IRS really shouldn't have been told to avoid looking into Biden's finances, or we'd probably have the answer by now. Assuming that there's some innocent explanation to all of this, those bureaucrats did Joe a big disservice.

TIL the steel dossier was 500 pages of pee tape accusations. gtfoh. as soon as it was revealed that it was russian in origin, every last word of it was discounted as entirely unreliable by the GOP (rightfully so).

now this comes out as russian in origin, and we say "well lets do IRS level accounting to find which parts we can 100% believe and build a case on". that type of cherry picking wouldnt clear the 4th amendment in court, its fruit of a poisonous tree.

all in, or all out. sorry not sorry. get a source of info that isnt the Kremlin, that goes for both sides.

The Steele dossier was always "Russian in origin", as compiled by a disgraced British spy working for Trump's political opponents. It was discounted because it was made up gossip.

Personally, I don't get the fixation on Ukraine. The Chinese money is far easier to follow and it's clear that Biden both received money from Hunter/James and that Hunter/James never provided any known service in return for these "business ventures" outside of their ability to deliver political influence. As for impeachment, there's really no need to go that far, Biden is going to lose at this rate.

It's sad how people of below average intelligence parrot the russian propaganda that trump is any good.



Just an attack against the authors, but zero comments about the actual content of the report.

How about you comment this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Links_between_Trump_associates_and_Russian_officials_and_spies

Let me guess, since you also wont like what you read you will also attack the source, not the text inside.

This post was edited by dropship on Feb 22 2024 10:54am

You did understand the fication on Ukraine a year ago when you are bitching about Democrats not wanting to provide funding for Ukraine

but why would you remember that drivel?

sure, but evidence and their sources dont and shouldnt work like that. if cops break into your house without a warrant and find a meth lab so big you can supply the hells angels nationwide it doesnt matter. procedurally the evidence is null and void.

if the standard we've set politically is "from putin = garbage" then this follows suit.

receipts from an ex UK spy are just as worthless as deposed russian nationals expelled from Ukraine. they could be accurate, embellished, or entirely false. based on the source we can't know, they're no longer fundamental facts they're fundamental hearsay.

as to ukraine vs china, i agree. and imo the implications of a behind closed doors chino-deepstate alliance are far worse than some low level oil corruption in a flipping soviet satellite state. cash for oil influence is small potatoes, any and all level of secrets going to china is dire.