The links are right there. They are not unrelated to the topic.

I didnt 'just happen' to find those articles.
I read them in the past and recalled them for use here within a couple of minutes of reading your post.

You being a TDS clown that opposes free speech, hates Trump and wants to lurch the conversation into discussing your misrepresentation and toxic framing of different issues doesn't actually justify your original claims or refute my points.

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Aug 19 2019 07:07pm

you just have to make this personal, huh? there's not a single topic i can discuss with you where you don't end up resorting to cheap ad hominem in order to deflect.

my point stands, trump's supreme court nominations are a clear signal pro money in politics, pro executive branch power grab, and against worker and women's rights... come back if you're willing or able to make an argument, i'm not gonna stoop to your level, not worth my time...

Dodging the points and playing the victim after all the shit you said is absolutely pathetic.

you know our conversation is there for everyone to read, right? it couldn't be more obvious WHO got emotional and started calling names.

i clearly framed the issue before you even joined the discussion, and elaborated what i meant after you apparently misunderstood what i described an executive power grab.

you trying to pivot, and me not having it, does not change who's dodging here. address the issues and try to refute them if you can, or just admit that you rather not discuss them - but let's stop the childish insults, you're insulting your own intelligence doing that...

'obtuse'
'camboy'
"you can't argue"
"you can just link articles to opinion pieces from some libertarian rag"
"stay on topic if you can"
"try using your own words to explain - if you can"
" triggered you to comment on this in the first place."

"you also haven't familiarised yourself with their stances on the powers of the executive branch (or the other topics i mentioned"
accusing me of 'struggling that much' because I didnt answer how you wanted me to

hundreds and hundreds of other threads with much worse for disagreeing with you.



But recognizing you are a "TDS clown" in response? That goes too far! way out of line!

Done! Good idea... https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=81747604&f=119

still don’t understand how fender aka heinrich the gutter dweller from dresden pretends to be versed in anything American. he failed his visa application here twice then got put on the persona non grata list when his lineage was discovered

Sometimes when you run a joke into the ground it just gets funnier and funnier

if saying 'don't be obtuse', discussing the topic at hand, specifically addressing an obvious distinction you chose not to make, constitutes 'name calling' to you, you should probably leave the internet immediately. funny how "delusional" from your side does not seem to qualify though.
incorrectly claiming that your uncreative TDS insult was merely a 'response' (when in reality i only called you 'camboy' once AFTER it) doesn't help to support your credibility. and again, this conversation is here for everyone to see, so you might as well stop lying, especially when it's so obvious...

but i guess your little off topic rants, not even trying to address the issue and going all in on your personal vendetta, mean you simply have no arguments, as expected. guess that's what you have to resort to in order to 'save face'...

sorry, but none of this will hide the fact that trump's supreme court picks stand for an executive branch power grab, corporate influence, and a weakening of workers', voters', and women's rights.

Thats certainly the democrat narrative you've eaten up instead of diving into the actual reasoning and characteristics of the men and cases involved.

Republicans evil and hate workers, women and puppies. thinking and reading bad just like orange man.

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Aug 19 2019 08:33pm