Theres actually a ton of evidence for the zoonosis theory if you are willing to look outside of the conspiracy echo chamber

oh really?

the only thing they have is a bat virus that is similar, thats it

why are you entertaining this parrot.

First off, being similar to a bat virus is a massive clue. These things don't come from nowhere, so if you find a virus that only differs by a little bit, that's a pretty big hint.

Second off, it has specific sequences that are known to be used to evade the immune system of bats and I think pangolins. That's another very big clue that it had to evade an active immune system in its development.

Thirdly, it lacks all markers of genetic engineering. It's been examined by dozens of labs in dozens of countries and nobody has been able to identify a single piece of evidence that suggests genetic manipulation. That's another big clue.

So if it was genetically engineered, it would have had to be done in such a way as to mimic an already existant virus that had to hide from a bat or pangolin immune system and was done in such a way that left no trace of intentional manipulation.

It's possible China or some other organization has this technology, but until we know they do there is simply zero evidence it's anything but a zoonotic event, and plenty of evidence it was a zoonotic event.


To be clear, even if we assume it was made in a lab, no lab in the world has the capability of building a functional virus from scratch. They would take 99% from an already existent virus. So no matter what, it is a zoonotic illness. Additionally, there is no reliable way to change a virus that leaves no trace. The question is not if it came from animals, the question is how it started infecting humans.

This post was edited by NetflixAdaptationWidow on Jun 12 2021 11:40am

yes, they took a bat virus and modified it

there have been multiple scientists saying that nothing like this exists in nature

its not a zoonotic illness when humans have messed around with their research

we know that chinese scientists were sick with covid symptoms in late 2019

what else do people like you need to see the obvious? xi junping could admit everything on live tv and some people would still talk the bat soup theory

But YOU don't know the history or the facts. That's the issue at hand lol. You just believe whatever some idiot posts on Bitchute. But that's okay because I think it helps you cope with whatever issues you're dealing with.

what are your sources? a place that fascist censor any thing that doesnt fit their paradigm and the say "fact checked" and you believe it. then commit another lack of thought when you been trained to reject content merely because of the platform it is on because your told to. Most likely all a result of trained TDS

Please cite the "multiple scientists" and what they are specifically saying. Unless they are making a very specific claim then it's probably a garbage opinion, because the fact of the matter is we dealt with a very similar virus when we had the SARS epidemic, so saying nothing like this exists in nature as a general statement is categorically false.

I'm skeptical of claims. That's the difference between us. What you think is obvious actually isn't when you evaluate the evidence.

This post was edited by NetflixAdaptationWidow on Jun 12 2021 02:53pm

"I'm skeptical of claims."
(the biggest crock statements i used to hear from atheists/antitheists. so super duper "skeptical" about every thing they dont believe yet so accommodating to everything they do believe. Any one says
"im a skeptic" its a sure sign a load of BS will follow.

little wonder atheists/antitheists claim the title of "skeptic"

a good definition of "skeptic" bullchit con artist.

and they haven't shown a single evidence of this, must be too hard to connect a camera to a microscope and show the "obvious"