d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Indian Writer Destroys My White Privilege
Prev12345613Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jul 12 2020 02:59pm
Quote (bogie160 @ Jul 12 2020 03:39pm)
Do Norman descendants in England inherit moral culpability for the Norman conquest? Studies demonstrate wealth disparities between Anglo-Saxon and Norman families to this day.


On some level, obviously. The first step is agreeing in principal and then decide if we can or should do anything. The principle is obvious, if you are the beneficiary of an immoral action you have some moral responsibility to correct it. The practical aspect comes next, and hell, there may not be a practical way to fix it.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jul 12 2020 03:00pm
Quote (ReturnFormer @ Jul 12 2020 03:58pm)
So, you're saying the government from Obama to trump was a continuous entity...?


Duh. 99% of the government was the exact same. We didn't re-pass laws, didn't rewrite the constitution, didn't do anything except elect a new executive. Companies don't become brand new companies when they hire a new CEO, the government doesn't become a brand new government when we elect a new president.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jul 12 2020 03:01pm
Quote (Queefy @ Jul 12 2020 03:41pm)
Not really, he said government would pay for it. Which leads to government gets money from tax payers, so who gets taxed.
Its an easy progression from the point he tried to make.

You cant just make a point and expect it to end there, it needs to be analyzed, because all of these things would have to be taken into account if the government was going to pay reparations.


You went off the rails in your second line lol.
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Jul 12 2020 03:02pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Jul 12 2020 03:36pm)
The American government doesn’t just represent anglo-saxons, Spaniards and Portuguese who predominantly dominated the slave trade.

None of my ancestors were here 50 years ago. If you think anyone in my family line & many like me are going to roll over and agree to have our tax dollars go to something we had nothing to do with then gl.

Imagine telling the Hispanic/Latino Or Asian populationS their taxes are increasing because we have to pay reparations. Would be the end of the Democratic Party.


You don't get to just show up and nullify our ongoing history. If you didn't want an American identity then you should have stayed someone else and deal with their shit.

You came to a country with a racist history who owes reparations to some people. Nobody made you come here and you probably heard about this even in a Slav classroom.


Quote (Queefy @ Jul 12 2020 04:32pm)
And where do you think the Government gets the money from? You guessed it.. tax payers.
So who pays for it? Everybody who is white? because it seems counter intuitive to tax people who arent white...
So from there, which white people get taxed? Many of us have great grandparents, grandparents, parents, etc. who immigrated after slavery was abolished...
My jewish great grandparents immigrated from poland in the early 1920's to escape the soviet polish war.
Should they (who couldnt speak more than a few phrases of english) have paid reparations after immigrating to the country 60 years after the abolishment of slavery?
Should I do so now as their descendant just because im white?
No, is the correct answer.

You cannot impose a 'white tax' on people, let alone people who have zero connections to slavery at all.


American government gets its money from people who no longer get tax returns and instead get tax bills. Aka earners.

Most people are free riders like you probably are.

I don't care how hard your grand parents worked. A lot of people work hard. You didn't escape a war, not your brag. They could have fought for their country instead of leave.

This post was edited by Skinned on Jul 12 2020 03:07pm
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jul 12 2020 03:11pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jul 12 2020 03:57pm)
Even if one agreed with the point you made, which I dont, it would still not make sense to let those whites whose ancestors arrived after the late 19th century pay reparations. Their ancestors arriven when slavery was long abolished and most lucrative land was already assigned. Why should they pay reparations to compensate for the sins that other people committed, people with which they have nothing in common but the white skin color?

Speaking of the inconsistencies: would black people who immigrated to the U.S. after 1964 also receive these reparations, or would they be excluded from them?
On a general note: the argument "you don't have to pay for lefty policy XY, the government will pay for it" is really modern liberalism in a nutshell. :rolleyes: :rofl:


Black people who immigrated after 1964 have still experienced problems even if they didn't experience full blown slavery or Jim Crow. Similarly white people have benefited from ongoing issues after 1964 like red-lining. Like Skinned said, you don't get to move and claim exclusion from the ongoing politics of the country. That goes for the good and the bad.

Still, those are practical issues. I'm only interested in the principle for now.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Jul 12 2020 03:12pm
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Jul 12 2020 03:13pm
skinned now showing off his faux-elitism by getting angry at people he calls “poor immigrants”. oh how some money changes people. right there with biden telling black Americans “you ain’t black” :lol:
Member
Posts: 22,442
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 76.11
Jul 12 2020 03:16pm
Quote (thundercock @ Jul 12 2020 01:28pm)
Instead of reparations, why don't we count their votes more? They were considered 3/5ths of a person for representation, maybe we can make it 5/3rd for 80 years?


Because groups like the North Carolina legislature engage in active voter suppression of Black people.
Member
Posts: 54,185
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Jul 12 2020 03:21pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ 12 Jul 2020 23:11)
Black people who immigrated after 1964 have still experienced problems even if they didn't experience full blown slavery or Jim Crow. Similarly white people have benefited from ongoing issues after 1964 like red-lining. Like Skinned said, you don't get to move and claim exclusion from the ongoing politics of the country. That goes for the good and the bad.

Still, those are practical issues. I'm only interested in the principle for now.


You yourself had written the following just one page earlier:

Quote (Thor123422 @ 12 Jul 2020 22:23)
I learned recently that almost all white families in the United States can trace their families wealth back to the United States literally giving away land, and that minority families were not allowed to apply for those land grants. That land was used as the seed money for those families for generations, investing and building multi-generational wealth, while at the same time black families were often disallowed from even getting loans for homes in the good parts of town, which then lead to less wealth, corporate exploitation, less political power to fight the exploitation, etc. etc.


You yourself claimed that the main source of inequality in the U.S. was the early settlement period of the country, when land was given to whites for free while blacks were enslaved. This doesnt affect the later white settlers like the Italians who came in the 1900s and 1910s, nor does it affect the Africans who came as actual immigrants (and not as slaves) after 1964.

Oh yeah, needless to say that your claim "almost all white families can trace their family wealth back to the period of free land" can obviously not be true since 30-50% of the white population came to the U.S. after the period of free land.
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Jul 12 2020 03:21pm
Quote (Handcuffs @ Jul 12 2020 02:16pm)
Because groups like the North Carolina legislature engage in active voter suppression of Black people.


so it would cancel our rural america
Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Jul 12 2020 03:23pm
Quote (Skinned @ Jul 12 2020 05:02pm)
You don't get to just show up and nullify our ongoing history. If you didn't want an American identity then you should have stayed someone else and deal with their shit.

You came to a country with a racist history who owes reparations to some people. Nobody made you come here and you probably heard about this even in a Slav classroom.




American government gets its money from people who no longer get tax returns and instead get tax bills. Aka earners.

Most people are free riders like you probably are.

I don't care how hard your grand parents worked. A lot of people work hard. You didn't escape a war, not your brag. They could have fought for their country instead of leave.



Lol so angry.


One thing I don’t get about some of you leftists is why do you constantly try to force your policies and ideas onto everyone.

No one is stopping you from taking money from your kids and giving it to blacks or whoever else. No one is stopping you and other like minded white people to give your shit away to whatever cause, but why do you do constantly try to force everyone to give money to things you care about? Form foundations, get tax breaks, etc. Money that I have to spare I rather send to my wife’s sister who has 4 kids and lives on less than 4 grand a year. Kids that have health issues. So fuck you and your white guilt you cuck, I care for myself and my own first of all.

Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev12345613Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll