Quote (ofthevoid @ Mar 28 2020 11:05am)
Cool deflection.
A reputable media source would make sure what they are publishing is 100% correct before releasing it to millions of eye balls. If you can't verify right away don't publish it until you can verify it, that's responsible journalism, which for many years was the standard. You don't make a claim just because it fits the propaganda narrative for the masses to read and listen to and after the story dies out you revise it on some hidden tab to cover your ass.
It's not a deflection... that's where the discussion started.
Why is CNN held to a widely different standard than Fox News evening shows, talk radio figures, or the president? It makes no sense. It's all information that informs or misinforms the general public. When Trump says something, or Rush Limbaugh says something, tens of millions of people believe it to be true. So the impact of a lie is monumentally more significant than a CNN fact check. Why is misinformation only worth criticizing when we attach the label "journalist" to the person that put it out into the world?
The obsession with nitpicking every fact-based media story for inaccuracy, while completely ignoring misinformation that is far more distributed and consequential, is ridiculous. It makes literally no sense.