Police shouldn't have more rights than our soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan when it comes to engaging civilians. Until that changes, you get what you deserve.

I'm not sure what you mean here.

The rules of engagement for a war zone are stricter than the rules of engagement in America. Effectively, it means a bunch of fucking hajis have more rights than Americans.

The facts of the Ferguson case are not in dispute. The Obama administration Justice department investigated and did not find any evidence in support of a civil rights offense,

As we discussed yesterday, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.



Do you honestly believe that this is true? We do pretty terrible things overseas.

I posted the radio show the prosecutor was on at the time where he admitted it lol. No need to call it "extraordinary".


https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/opa/press-releases/attachments/2015/03/04/ferguson_police_department_report.pdf

Is this the investigation you're referencing? Because it's pretty damning to your claims if it is. Unless you're, once again, compartmentalizing. These riots have never been about single actions, even though single actions are the catalysts.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Mar 8 2021 07:48pm

There was no evidence to support charges. Credible witnesses validated the officer's story. Forensic evidence validated the officer's story. The prosecutor did not want to find himself leading a failed prosecution into an officer of the law where the evidence completely prevented any sort of positive verdict (for the prosecutor).

There is no reason to be conspiratorial when there are simpler explanations available to us. The burden of proof for a conspiracy is understandably significant.

This post was edited by bogie160 on Mar 8 2021 07:49pm

Oh yeah, I forgot you've dismissed people saying exactly what they did and why as a conspiracy before.

You really think prosecutors make a habit of not asking for charges? That just by coincidence there was only one case where the prosecutor wasn't convinced there was a need for charges on that day, and that his family ties to law enforcement had no effect, and that his routinely working with that police department had no effect, and that he openly admitted to what he did and why is just a "conspiracy".

lol

Really though, two things can be true at once. The prosecutor can throw the case, and the case can be bad. This might have been one of those cases, but the routine abuses by the police department and the judicial system of Ferguson are well documented in the report you yourself are citing. So it's only an issue that it's a weak case to people who want to pretend it's all about one incident and not about a nation wide and local pattern of abuse.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Mar 8 2021 07:57pm

will the looters remember his name by now?

In Promising His Name Will Always Be Remembered, Nancy Pelosi Calls George Floyd ‘George Kirby’
https://www.bitchute.com/video/3zRTaYosp4q6/

That happens once every eternity

Looting will happen . They have their shopping list ready.