We going to pretend the Republicans had nothing to do with this?

No pretending necessary. :/

Might want to look up how these processes were set up buddy.

They were voted on by the House. The Democrats won the vote concerning this.

The Democrats are following the rules Republicans set up for the Benghazi hearings.

It's truly hilarious how whiny conservatives become when you play using the rules they wanted.

The House voted on the rules last week. They are following what they voted for. It never ceases to amaze me how some folk on here can twist the facts, just so they can argue about it. :/

Might want to look at Benghazi again.

YOU might want to quit looking for comparisons that are strictly coincidental, even where they MIGHT be similar. ^^

https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/2019/11/08/alexander-vindmans-testimony-appears-confirm-illegally-leaked-whistle-blower/

this is an interesting catch from the Vindman testimony, which either shows that he leaked the phone call to Ciaramella, or leaked it to someone who did
They don't explicitly state it in the transcript, however its blatantly obvious from the transcript. When Jordan asks who Vindman talked to about the call, Swalwell and Schiff cut in and shut him down and stop him from saying who, saying the question would reveal the whistleblower. The next page has a blanked out name mentioned, and Adam Schiff shuts down the proceedings even though the republicans still have time left on the clock and adjourns for lunch in violation of house rules.



what makes this peculiar is that early on in Vindman's statement he says;



So how is it that Vindman can simultaneously testify that he doesn't know who the whistleblower is, and Swalwell/Schiff can interrupt Vindman declaring who he talked to about the phone call because that would reveal the whistleblower?
There only seems to be two logical scenarios- either Vindman is perjurying himself (unlikely to do so directly and provably), or Vindman talked to Eric Ciaramella but "doesn't know for sure" that he was the whistleblower, be it through intentional ignorance or doubts. Swalwell and Schiff however are fully aware that Ciaramella is the whistleblower. So that would necessitate them to cut off Vindman from talking about him, which also means unless Vindman is the world's biggest idiot he would instantly be aware that was the guy.

This post was edited by Goomshill on Nov 10 2019 03:39pm

I think there's a 3rd option. Schiff KNOWS that the answer will implicate Schiff in meeting with and coaching the whistleblower.



/e ...or worse. That this whole impeachment inquiry is another fabricated pile of BS.

This post was edited by Ghot on Nov 10 2019 03:45pm