Quote (fender @ Oct 14 2020 12:34pm)
back to school, kid - an ad populum is not an argument. to what exactly were your "fuckhead" and "eurotrash" insults "replies in kind / to tone"? to me it seems like you were triggered into oblivion because i called out your idiotic shutdown and vitamin d takes, so you had to resort to childish namecalling, lol.
also, don't assume i didn't notice your massive dodge concerning your desperate reframing of a right wing terrorist plot. again: would you also defend a plan to kidnap and kill the cheeto mussolini based on that 'logic'?
An ad populum would have been "everyone agrees you are wrong," which is not what I said. I said everyone knows I respond to tone. Don't come at me with logic when you don't know how it works.
To what exactly? This:
Quote (fender @ Oct 14 2020 10:12am)
lol, santara went full science-denying bigot in this one. imagine your identity is defending a broken system, and you have to resort to crackpot theories to justify it, because the facts simply aren't on your side. that's what propaganda and brainwashing does to the weak, uncritical mind... hilarious.
science-denying - a blatant attempt to imply I don't know what I'm talking about
bigot - pretty fucking obvious here
crackpot theories - another shot like "science-denying"
weak, uncritical mind - also pretty fucking obvious
You spew this kind of shit so constantly, to most anyone who bothers to engage you, and have zero fucking clue how it's received. You're quite simply a giant fucking douche, and you act surprised that people push back? Go fuck yourself.
I don't give a fuck what you "noticed," you completely ignored all the scientific information that I presented first, and proceeded with your invective from the get go. So you've already shown zero capacity to engage my points, why would I turn around and engage yours?