Regarding facebook, I think you're reading too much into it. Even if they believed that Trump will lose in 2020, they still would have to deal with tens of millions of republicans and conservatives among their users. Antagonizing those by being blatantly partisan in their censoring and fact-checking operations would be stupid for their business, irrespective of Trump or the outcome of the 2020 elections. As you said, Zuckerberg and Facebook seem driven by pure capitalistic greed. It doesnt seem to me like they have the same strong urge to shove a particular social agenda down everyone's throats like Google or Hollywood.

thanks for answering my question

ahhh yes the millions of people so mad that they share the same meme image:

"What facebook is doing is wrong, share this image with as many people as you can to let them know you support the President and wont stand for fake news. If facebook doesn't change their act we will all delete our accounts!"

meanwhile no one will, even censorship could cause MORE engagement. and there are still millions and millions of indian people and other foreigners to sell facebook to if the USA says no mass.

it might lose facebook some money, but overall it wouldn't cause much of a backlash. Zuck is just the kind of guy who will fuck people over for 1$ when he could have been paid 0.90$ to do the right thing.

Horford found his way back on the site huh

10 Minutes after saying Trump hid the raid information from Dems because of potential leaks,

The President went on to explain extremely sensitive and severely classified information to reporters without one moment of consideration for what he is doing

this is the fucking trash you fucking retards voted for

Triggered lil guy... lmao.

classified info about the raid that already happened?

https://apnews.com/389f03e40e874bbe9d1687925e517d05

hey guys you remember that thing a few weeks ago about how Giuliani's associates were straw donors for a Ukrainian guy to give campaign donations to a Trump super-PAC and that would be the big new story that takes down Trump, and then it kind of got totally forgotten or whatever (?)
well lookie here

new guilty plea from Imaad Zuberi, who admits to being a straw donor who funneled money from the saudi Sheikh Mohammed Al Rahbani into Obama's inaugural committee in 2012, in order to get his picture taken with Obama and lobby on behalf of him, and other foreign clients. Its unclear how many times he's been a straw donor and for how many foreign donors, but he's a very well connected donor who has served as a top fundraiser for Obama, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump as well as other congressmen like Lindsey Graham, organizing large donations to all of them. He was caught because it turns out he was very sloppily funneling the money (using names of dead relatives or completely made up people, and even using Rahbani's name directly on one donation) and because he was cheating his foreign donors and embezzling the money, skimming $750,000 out of a $850,000 donation he was supposed to make on Rahbani's behalf to Obama.

/e also it appears Obama and Biden both did take that picture with Rahbani, and the middleman was trying to shake down and extort Rahbani which probably made this easier to discover;



This post was edited by Goomshill on Oct 29 2019 01:16pm

which part made you feel sensitive?

the dog? he declassified the dog’s picture.
calling al-Baghdadi a coward? we can see how that may have resonated with you and made you feel sympathetic towards the terrorist al-Baghdadi

Hey hey, that dog will have to get a new identity and be protected by bodyguards for the rest of his life - I mean, after his face has been made public by the moron Trump, every terrorist in the world will try to assassinate him in revenge for Al-Baghadi!