Quote (doomchaser @ Feb 25 2024 12:16am)
and ? you saying the creationist are not manipulating the facts or just straight out lying ? keep going past 4:30 and you start to understand in another 45 secs ... Who spinning the facts or misunderstanding science...Or just striaGHT up lying to children to give them a happy story of reality ..If you want to believe in stories that up to you cheers mate..
buckle up butter cup...........
the only real mystery here is who would name themselves "potholer
tree rings. have seen testimony that trees can grow more than one ring in a year depending on conditions.
@1:50 "carbon dating doesnt work under certain circumstances." examples are given. whats amusing here is 'potholer is actually in agreement with hovind
@3:06 'potholer claims a source is not given when clearly it is. (perhaps a dirty tactic played for those not attentive? like 'atheists desperate for arguments?
@4:30 "carbon dating isnt very useful in dating fossils or the age of the earth........................... ok?
@5:15 very amusing
but he is only agreeing with hovid again. (cant carbon date it)
@5:50 embarrassing yes. might make you feel good but has little use as an argument
@7:35 what did the shellac date again?
@7:45 'potholer expresses disdain for the guys method. lacked a reasoned counter argument tho
................................ here it is. shellac dated at 20,000 years. ........... 'potholer owned himself .........deeamm boi ouch
@7:35 "you will get a date for the preservative and thats exactly what he got"
Quote
Or just striaGHT up lying to children to give them a happy story of reality
assertion fallacy. if you have a reasoned argument post it
This post was edited by TiStuff on Feb 25 2024 04:08am