https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obdI7tgKLtAproject veritas's ""big scoop"" for tonight was apparently some very anecdotal evidence of 1-2 nurses / HHS employees refusing to report adverse side effects from covid vaccines in order to artificially inflate its perceived effectiveness
they can point to a few isolated incidents like a 15 year old developing blood clots after a pfizer vaccine with 'unclear etiology', which is then not reported as a side-effect, and doctors saying they don't bother with the VAERS system at all
I don't think its indicative of any widespread campaign nor does it tell us anything we couldn't have predicted in some isolated cases in a national roll-out, but it does cast some doubts on how accurate the methodology of medical analysis can be in a case like covid. We've got lots of studies and metastudies that rely on these kinds of reporting and if datasets at the very base were being fudged, even if slightly, that can greatly skew analysis. The same was true for the very arbitrary designations of cause-of-death that were contributing to vastly disproportionate rates of early reported death rates last year, which were eventually shown to be completely untrue. Now we can look at the more reliable, wider lens of stuff like the CDC's excess death rate to get a realistic gauge for how deadly covid-19 is, but we don't have similar utilities to test either the total effectiveness or total risk of vaccines.
Now any good analysis is going to make assumptions about the unreliability of their data and potential for underreporting / misreporting, but that itself is a significant amount of uncertainty into results that have been cited as authoritative proof.
I think there's room for some doubts over the legitimacy of some of this rushed research and politically compromised approval process without the absurd excesses of hacks like PV using slowed-down speech and pixelation and spooky music to pretend its all a big conspiracy theory.
This post was edited by Goomshill on Sep 20 2021 08:35pm