Quote (El1te @ Jun 23 2022 01:03pm)
Well I'm not.
I recognize that Biden received more votes than Trump, and thus won the election.
However the election was NOT legitimate, as the Hunter Biden laptop story was systematically censored from most public forums.
A free press is required for a legitimate election.
Therefore, Biden is NOT the legitimate POTUS, but merely a usurper.
This is fact.
Quote
On October 14, 2020, the New York Post published an article about a purported meeting between then-Vice President Joe Biden and Burisma advisor Vadym Pozharskyi. The article was based on an April 2015 email from Pozharskyi to Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, who served on the board of Burisma, thanking Hunter Biden for inviting him to meet his father in Washington, D.C. The Post claimed the email showed Joe Biden was untruthful when he claimed he had "never spoken to [his] son about his overseas business dealings" and claimed to have evidence in support of the Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory regarding the reasons for the firing of Viktor Shokin. The Biden campaign denied Joe Biden had any meeting with Pozharskyi and said that if they had ever met, it would have been a brief encounter.[3] Witnesses at the diner where they allegedly met said Biden briefly passed by to see an old friend. The Post reported in its story that Pozharskyi declined to comment, and he didn't comment to a Politico journalist who reported extensively on the story a year later.[4]
The Post reported that the email was found in a cache of data extracted from the external hard drive of the laptop computer that appeared to belong to Hunter Biden. The Post reported that the owner of the repair shop had made a copy of the hard drive before it was seized by the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and that the copy was later provided to the Post by Donald Trump's personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani. The subpoena to seize the laptop was issued by a grand jury on behalf of the U.S. attorney's office in Wilmington, which was later reported to be investigating Biden about lobbying and financial matters.[5][6]
First reported by the New York Post before voting day. It would have been reported earlier but it was timed and given to the post 2 weeks before voting day for maximum impact.
most of the "censorship" you're referring to took place by private companies, twitter etc, after voting day.
unless the timeline i have mixed up with what you mean.