d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Twitter Fact Checks Donald Trump > Where Do You Stand?
Prev1151617181920Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 1680Replies: 195Track Topic
Member
Posts: 33,865
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 633.87
#161
May 28 2020 07:44am
Quote (Skinned @ May 28 2020 09:17am)
D2jsp is my only social media.

On this platform I've had my account regulated and suspended for my speech. The publisher of this website suspended me for supporting pedophile For advocating unisex bathrooms for transgendered people like 5+ years ago.

On my profile right now if you click my name and my warning count it states supports pedophile lol. Thanks Paul.

But I wasn't elected president of the United States so I can't take personal slights and write laws to address them through executive order and not through traditional lawmaking.

Maybe if i get elected to an office I will use it that way.

I love how donald trump has turned Republican party into a party against business rights. Trump could try to nationalize any industry at this point and you would be supportive lol.


Trump is asking the FCC to clarify section 230 protections, as seen here.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230

Forget that the original purpose of the law was to enable parents to restrict children access to porn. The protection that the media companies shelter under is government given, and what the government gives it can also take away.

Quote
(3) The Internet and other interactive computer services offer a forum for a true diversity of political discourse


This is likely what he's asking the FCC to clarify. If Twitter does not allow for a true diversity of political discourse, does it forfeit 230 protections?

Given that they weren't meant to have these protections in the first place (the law spends 90%+ talking about sex trafficking and porn), I'd say the answer should be yes.
Member
Posts: 25,534
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 11,596.00
#162
May 28 2020 07:50am
Goom mentioned it already. I really think Minnesota goes red this election cycle because of this. Governor is surely fucked as well.
Member
Posts: 53,140
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
#163
May 28 2020 08:00am
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4877821/user-clip-jerry-nadler-2004-paper-ballots-extremely-susceptible-fraud

so this issue is what started all this huh :lol: also didn’t the media and lefties (apologies for the repetition) spend the last 3+ Years or so begging for more election security after they blamed President Obama for letting “russia” ‘compromise the 2016 election’

This post was edited by excellence on May 28 2020 08:00am
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 285.00
#164
May 28 2020 08:24am
Quote (ofthevoid @ May 28 2020 09:50am)
Goom mentioned it already. I really think Minnesota goes red this election cycle because of this. Governor is surely fucked as well.


Nothing like a good lynching to get the right out to vote!


Sorry, hanging fruit, etc.

Strange fruit indeed.
Member
Posts: 64,656
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
#165
May 28 2020 08:36am
Quote (bogie160 @ May 28 2020 08:44am)
Trump is asking the FCC to clarify section 230 protections, as seen here.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230

Forget that the original purpose of the law was to enable parents to restrict children access to porn. The protection that the media companies shelter under is government given, and what the government gives it can also take away.

This is likely what he's asking the FCC to clarify. If Twitter does not allow for a true diversity of political discourse, does it forfeit 230 protections?

Given that they weren't meant to have these protections in the first place (the law spends 90%+ talking about sex trafficking and porn), I'd say the answer should be yes.


Yeah, vague as hell. Does the FCC have the ability to clarify that? Seems like even if the FCC says something twitter doesn't like and they lose their safe protections that it would be overturned by a court for being super vague pretty quickly.
Member
Posts: 90,686
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,489.69
#166
May 28 2020 08:40am
Quote (Thor123422 @ May 28 2020 09:36am)
Yeah, vague as hell. Does the FCC have the ability to clarify that? Seems like even if the FCC says something twitter doesn't like and they lose their safe protections that it would be overturned by a court for being super vague pretty quickly.


"plz FCC, they won't let me be, or let me be me, so let me see. they tried to shut me down on all me Tweets, but it will be empty without me." Trump, probably.
Member
Posts: 64,656
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
#167
May 28 2020 08:42am
Quote (thesnipa @ May 28 2020 09:40am)
"plz FCC, they won't let me be, or let me be me, so let me see. they tried to shut me down on all me Tweets, but it will be empty without me." Trump, probably.


Yeah, there's also the issue that Trump wasn't removed from the platform, or had any tweets taken down, and all of the cases I've heard of where a right wing person claimed censorship they were actually banned for something stupid that broke the ToS like tweeting gay porn at Nazis because for some reason totally unknown to everybody and not obvious to any group the Nazis thought the user was on their side (Sargon of Akkad)
Member
Posts: 33,539
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,617.52
#168
May 28 2020 09:43am
Quote (Skinned @ May 28 2020 08:24am)
Election fraud is a made up problem. It just doesn't occur on any meaningful numbers in the US. Twitter is right and Trump is making excuses for his failures in advance.

There's even a very real chance that trump will try to hang onto power if he loses the election by saying it was fraudulent.

We know authoritarians hate democracy and Trump is no exception.


You mean like how they didn't call the last election until 4:30am because Shillary was blind with rage?
Member
Posts: 33,539
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,617.52
#169
May 28 2020 09:44am
Quote (ofthevoid @ May 28 2020 09:50am)
Goom mentioned it already. I really think Minnesota goes red this election cycle because of this. Governor is surely fucked as well.


The looting and the firestorms were a brilliant play by the Dems indeed.
Member
Posts: 51,321
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,400.67
#170
May 28 2020 11:10pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ 28 May 2020 17:43)
You mean like how they didn't call the last election until 4:30am because Shillary was blind with rage?


I still remember how they were grasping at straws. "... perhaps she can win Alaska?!"
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1151617181920Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2024 d2jsp  Contact