Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jan 21 2022 01:59am)
Merkel and her Christian Democrats were (slightly) more hawkish on Russia than our new chancellor Olaf Scholz and his Social Democrats. We Germans are more hesitant to fully take sides in this conflict because we have far less economic interest in a Ukrainian EU membership than in trade with Russia, just like we have no real interest in admitting Ukraine to the NATO. On Ukraine, German and American interests simply diverge. This fact, rather than the energy dependence, is at the root of these disagreements.
Also note that Putin/Russia's state finances are completely dependent on the revenue from commodity sales to the West. The one time he tried to pivot to China, during the height of the sanctions in the wake of the annexation of Crimea, he got bend over backwards and Xi definitely used more than JustTheTip. Russia had to sign a long-term contract with China which stipulated such low prices that the Russians barely make any profit off of these exports. Russia simply cannot have any interest in cutting off gas shipment to the West, not even during times of war. Likewise, they cannot have any interest in Europe contemplating a reorientation of its energy mix, e.g. a shift to LNG. For all these reasons, I am not concerned with the Russians weaponizing our energy dependence. It is an attractive talking point, but doesn't hold up to scrutiny.
Putin is a ruthless and shrewd asshole, but he's not a fool. He will not commit medium-term economic suicide for short-term military gain.
Notably, America had the capacity to subsidize construction of LNG terminals and exports and sell at a loss and just absorb it because we have a robust economy, while like you say Russia is a petro-state. That means America
had the economic leverage, even if it went as brazen as Berlin Airdrop 2.0. And it wasn't in our interests to see Russia implode either, nobody sane actually
wants to topple Putin, it was an issue of playing the game to our advantage. Exploiting that leverage required will and competency, which Biden lacks. We just straight up said that Putin can have his pipeline, forget about LNG, take Ukraine, do whatever, go nuts. Putin is just capitalizing on America being asleep at the wheel. Biden will slap some meaningless sanctions on Russia while the gas flows unimpeded from Vyborg to Greifswald, he'll probably get on camera and shake his fist and give a sternly worded statement of concern as Russian troops 'liberate' Independence Square in Kyiv.
Ukraine going back to the Russian sphere of influence isn't bothersome, but Putin coming out in the end with uncontested long term energy leverage over Europe is a huge issue. It doesn't give him unlimited control or total leverage, its still a two-way relationship of necessity as Russia remains an export economy, but its a giant strategic gain on the geopolitical board.