d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Major Ticket Policy > Part 1
Prev123456Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 285.00
Dec 5 2019 06:10am
Quote (Plaguefear @ Dec 5 2019 05:47am)
Warren comes off as a chameleon to me, she wants to appeal the the masses and will say what she has to to get it.
Bernie comes off as a guy who cares for people and wants to help them.


She's a shrill female like HRC and that's why so many people are turned off by her. She's not even cool. She is the kind of person who will say "who let the dog's out" trying to act cool around black people lol.
Member
Posts: 48,766
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 1.93
Dec 5 2019 06:22am
Quote (Skinned @ Dec 5 2019 11:10pm)
She's a shrill female like HRC and that's why so many people are turned off by her. She's not even cool. She is the kind of person who will say "who let the dog's out" trying to act cool around black people lol.


Or i am "1/18th cheroke" to appeal to native americans.
Member
Posts: 66,069
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Dec 5 2019 06:32am
Quote (EndlessSky @ 5 Dec 2019 03:36)
That means you vote for orange Drumpf

Top kek



- Spending 750 000 $ to have people wishing you "happy 73th birthday"
- Cutting food stamps to 750 000 people ?

Keks
Member
Posts: 51,283
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,400.67
Dec 5 2019 06:39am
I think Bernie and Warren are pretty close in terms of policy/platform, but very different in their personality and style.

Warren comes across as a smartass with an annoying professorial attitude, and it's somewhat unclear how much she really would have the little man's back if elected. Warren presents her agenda in a way that appeals mostly to college-educated and/or coastal elites. The core message of her campaign imho is not for poor or left-behind people, it is for wealthy liberals who like to hear this kind of "build-a-better-society" rhetoric.

Bernie utilizes an angry, zealous, revolutionary rhetoric and appeals a lot more to working-class and blue collor people. He's very authentic and you just know that he's sincere in his desire to fight for the poor and struggling. His messsage seems tailored to those who really suffered from capitalism and/or globalism, instead of its beneficiaries who just want to silence their conscience.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Dec 5 2019 06:40am
Member
Posts: 33,511
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,617.52
Dec 5 2019 05:55pm
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Dec 5 2019 07:32am)
- Spending 750 000 $ to have people wishing you "happy 73th birthday"
- Cutting food stamps to 750 000 people ?

Keks


You’re

F I R E D
Member
Posts: 66,069
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Dec 5 2019 06:49pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ 6 Dec 2019 00:55)
You’re

F I R E D


You probably checked and yes it's true.
Insane.
Member
Posts: 25,860
Joined: Jun 14 2006
Gold: 381.00
Trader: Trusted
Dec 6 2019 04:35pm
digital privacy and ownership
Member
Posts: 2,660
Joined: Mar 28 2010
Gold: 0.00
Dec 6 2019 05:16pm
Government Expansion
Economy
Infrastructure
Education
Defense
Immigration
Healthcare
Member
Posts: 25,860
Joined: Jun 14 2006
Gold: 381.00
Trader: Trusted
Dec 10 2019 03:39pm
this is a list of everything mentioned so far: (i removed the repeats)
Taxes
Healthcare
Police
Military
Defense
Utilities
Energy
Immigration
Law
Diversity
Equality
Foreign policy
Education
Housing
Safety Nets
Environment
Trade
Economy
Weather
Smaller government
Homelessness
food crisis
Taxing corporations
crony capitalism
Digital privacy
Information ownership
Government Expansion
Infrastructure

I have tried lumping them into smaller brackets for a first draft of the list:
Crime and Punishment
Economy
Education
Environment
Foreign Relations
Government Assistance
Healthcare
Human Rights
Immigration
Infrastructure
Military
National Security
Powers of Government
Tax
Trade

some of these i'm not sure if they fit well enough.
i.e. equality, diversity, digital privacy and ownership of info, i'm lumping into "Human Rights". also climate/weather effects i believe can be summed under "Infrastructure" and "Environment"

i'm assuming we can all create our own sub-brackets for policies, but if you believe there should be more separation or anything added let me know.
Member
Posts: 25,860
Joined: Jun 14 2006
Gold: 381.00
Trader: Trusted
Dec 19 2019 04:41pm
alright, last chance to argue anything if you want to.

Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Dec 5 2019 07:32am)
- Spending 750 000 $ to have people wishing you "happy 73th birthday"
- Cutting food stamps to 750 000 people ?

Keks

i read up on this btw. i fully endorse it.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/nearly-700-000-will-lose-food-stamps-usda-work-requirement-n1095726
Quote
The agency said that it found 2.9 million adults on the SNAP rolls were able-bodied and did not have dependents, and it said 2.1 million were not working.

Quote
The USDA rule change affects people between the ages of 18 and 49 who are childless and not disabled. Under current rules, this group is required to work at least 20 hours a week for more than three months over a 36-month period to qualify for food stamps, but states have been able to create waivers for areas that face high unemployment.


it gets rid of able-bodied freeloaders. there's no reason we should be paying for people to do nothing, when they are fully able to do so.
it's actually a rather weak bill. 20h a week for 3 months over a 3 year period. a young kids paper-route is longer hours than that.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev123456Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll