Quote (Ghot @ 7 Jul 2019 18:04)

Pretty much. It's more like a "super" 2700X, than an Intel killer. I assume it will be more happily accepted as a work station processor, than it will by gamers.


/e But maybe that's what AMD was aiming for. Not positive, but I think the business sector demand is still greater than the gaming demand... at least in the CPU world.

Quote (Klexmoo @ Jul 7 2019 12:12pm)

For use cases like compute and more parallel workloads in the datacenter, this is much more positive than many expected. Their power consumption is much lower, with higher performance, than intel.

Quote (Ghot @ Jul 7 2019 02:08pm)

Yeah, but for all the hype it doesn't beat the 2700X very much in workstation crap. It's pretty much just a 2000 series, bump... at least speed wise.

Quote (zell1luk @ Jul 8 2019 11:38pm)

I mean were you really expecting like a 30% jump in performance? It's practically on par with Intel single thread in Cinebench, and with driver and game optimizations, we could see that on gaming performance as well. Literally watch the first minute of Linus' review where it's tied with the 9700k in CS:GO.

Quote (Ghot @ 7 Jul 2019 08:59)

It seems to excel at rendering type tasks, but still gets nailed by Intel in gaming.


https://www.anandtech.com/show/14605/the-and-ryzen-3700x-3900x-review-raising-the-bar/13

Quote (Secksii @ Jul 9 2019 07:27am)

As expected, always the same story. The hype died as soon as it launches and still can't beat intels outdated cpus in gaming sigh.

https://linuxreviews.org/AMD_Ryzen_3000_series_CPUs_can%27t_do_Random_on_boot_causing_Boot_Failure_on_newer_Linux_distributions
Lul

Quote (urbanshaft @ 9 Jul 2019 21:19)

nobody is gaming
and using linux
the fuck