d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Breaking News Thread > And Other Stuff You Want To Share
Prev1202122232470Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 45,946
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 22,189.49
Sep 11 2019 04:28pm
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/immigration/supreme-court-allows-enforcement-trump-asylum-limits-n1052751

asylum ban is reinstated by the supreme court, overruling injunctions
the rest is all formalities since its going to be upheld

this is the ban conditioned on 'if they passed through a 3rd country without applying for asylum there first', which effects basically 99% of the asylum exploiters
this means the full blown ban is back in place.

This post was edited by Goomshill on Sep 11 2019 04:29pm
Member
Posts: 51,384
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,400.67
Sep 11 2019 04:52pm
Quote (Goomshill @ 12 Sep 2019 00:28)
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/immigration/supreme-court-allows-enforcement-trump-asylum-limits-n1052751

asylum ban is reinstated by the supreme court, overruling injunctions
the rest is all formalities since its going to be upheld

this is the ban conditioned on 'if they passed through a 3rd country without applying for asylum there first', which effects basically 99% of the asylum exploiters
this means the full blown ban is back in place.


Great victory!

I wonder, however, if this approach will be as effective the administration hopes. What if all the migrants from Central America apply for asylum in Mexico and the Mexican authorities reject them all within one week - then, the migrants come to the US border showing their Mexicam asylum application and the rejection paperwork. Wouldnt they in this scenario still be allowed to apply for asylum in the US, with all the loopholes and problem that come with it?

Essentially, even with this ruling, the US is still depending on Mexico's cooperation. It's a big step forward, dont get me wrong, but this rule change is still a treating of symptoms within a broken immigration system, and not solving issues and loopholes at their source.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Sep 11 2019 04:53pm
Member
Posts: 21,971
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 1.66
Sep 11 2019 05:20pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Sep 8 2019 05:53am)

I've got more money in my bank account than 8chan ever netted this guy


don8
Member
Posts: 53,141
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Sep 11 2019 06:49pm
https://www.yahoo.com/news/sex-assault-claims-rock-arderns-zealand-government-024012386.html

prominent politician who is notable for the objective handling of a tragedy while ridiculing everyone else (and wearing an appropriate outfit to do so) is at the center of a sexual assault scandal in the government
Member
Posts: 25,582
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 11,571.00
Sep 11 2019 07:25pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Sep 11 2019 06:28pm)
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/immigration/supreme-court-allows-enforcement-trump-asylum-limits-n1052751

asylum ban is reinstated by the supreme court, overruling injunctions
the rest is all formalities since its going to be upheld

this is the ban conditioned on 'if they passed through a 3rd country without applying for asylum there first', which effects basically 99% of the asylum exploiters
this means the full blown ban is back in place.


Wouldn't it be great if the judicial branch worked as it should?

How many scotus overrulings is it going to take for liberal judges to stop trying to impede the executive branch not on judicial grounds but on blatantly political ones.
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 285.00
Sep 11 2019 07:39pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Sep 9 2019 03:45pm)
https://freebeacon.com/politics/federal-court-rules-rand-paul-attackers-30-day-sentence-too-lenient/

rand paul's neighbor got his sentence overturned in court today, where the 6th circuit rejected it as unreasonably lenient and ordered him resentenced under harsher guidelines. He's facing 21-27 months where previously he only served 30 days



womp womp


This guy hurt the senator pretty badly, he needs some time.

Quote (Ghot @ Sep 10 2019 07:07am)
This might be interesting, or it might just be the Dems trying to toss another wrench into the works...






http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICW-dGD1M18


The CIA agent that the Cheney cabal outed from cover because her husband debunked the Nigerian yellowcake uranium theory justifying the Iraq War that Scooter Libby took the fall for then was pardoned later on?

Interesting.

Quote (ofthevoid @ Sep 11 2019 09:25pm)
Wouldn't it be great if the judicial branch worked as it should?

How many scotus overrulings is it going to take for liberal judges to stop trying to impede the executive branch not on judicial grounds but on blatantly political ones.


Until Nov 2020? Lol.

This post was edited by Skinned on Sep 11 2019 07:40pm
Member
Posts: 51,384
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,400.67
Sep 12 2019 04:23am
Quote (ofthevoid @ 12 Sep 2019 03:25)
Wouldn't it be great if the judicial branch worked as it should?

How many scotus overrulings is it going to take for liberal judges to stop trying to impede the executive branch not on judicial grounds but on blatantly political ones.


Amen.
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,296.69
Sep 13 2019 01:47pm
Felicity Huffman Sentenced to 14 Days Behind Bars ... In College Bribery Case

12:37 PM PT -- The judge just sentenced Felicity to 14 days behind bars, a $30k fine, one year of supervised release and 250 hours of community service.

She'll start her prison time at a later date, she will not be taken into custody today.

This post was edited by Beowulf on Sep 13 2019 01:49pm
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,296.69
Sep 15 2019 02:09pm
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-kavanaugh-idUSKBN1W00Q8

Quote
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump rejected Democrats’ calls for impeaching Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh on Sunday after a new report involving sexual misconduct allegations, encouraging Kavanaugh to sue for libel and suggesting the Justice Department could “rescue” him.

Some Democratic presidential candidates called for Kavanaugh’s impeachment, saying he lied under oath, after a New York Times report on Saturday disclosed new information about sexual misconduct allegations against him.

The Times essay, drawn from an upcoming book written by the newspaper’s reporters, said it was able to corroborate an allegation by former classmate Deborah Ramirez that Kavanaugh exposed his penis to her during a drunken party at a Yale University when they were undergraduates.

“Brett Kavanaugh should start suing people for libel, or the Justice Department should come to his rescue,” Trump wrote on Twitter.

It was unclear what action the Republican president was advocating the Justice Department take.

The Times article said at least seven people, including Ramirez’ mother, had heard about the incident long before Kavanaugh became a judge. Kavanaugh denied Ramirez’ accusations during his acrimonious Senate confirmation hearing last fall.

The Times piece also disclosed a previously unreported account that echoes Ramirez’ story. Former Yale classmate Max Stier describes Kavanaugh pushing his private parts into the hand of a female student at a party. The report said the classmate notified U.S. senators and the FBI about the incident, but the FBI did not investigate. The FBI did not respond to a request for comment on the report.

Kavanaugh did not comment to the Times on the allegations. The Supreme Court press officers did not immediately return a request for comment.

Kavanaugh, a conservative appointed by Trump, was confirmed by the U.S. Senate in October after he denied accusations of sexual assault from three women. After acrimonious hearings, the Senate confirmed his appointment to the high court by 50-48 vote, one of the tightest margins ever for a justice.

Trump did not mention the Times article but blamed “radical left Democrats” and the “LameStream Media” for going after Kavanaugh. In a series of Twitter posts, he accused Democrats of threatening impeachment to influence Kavanaugh’s opinions on court cases.

“They want to scare him into turning Liberal!” he wrote.

At least four Democrats running to replace Trump in 2020 called for Kavanaugh’s impeachment on Sunday.

“I sat through those hearings. Brett Kavanaugh lied to the U.S. Senate and most importantly to the American people,” Senator Kamala Harris wrote on Twitter. “He must be impeached.”

“Confirmation is not exoneration, and these newest revelations are disturbing. Like the man who appointed him, Kavanaugh should be impeached,” Senator Elizabeth Warren said in another Twitter post.

Julian Castro, housing secretary under President Barack Obama, and former congressman Beto O’Rourke also said the new allegation should be investigated.

“We know he lied under oath. He should be impeached,” O’Rourke said on Twitter.




Member
Posts: 53,434
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 7,526.30
Sep 15 2019 02:34pm
That must be the Democrats taking the high road again.

Has anyone else noticed the the high road seems to be littered with fake rape accusations and immature calls for impeachment? strange
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1202122232470Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll