call me crazy but i think banning those who commited crimes is a priority over banning those who have not commited crimes

What issue do you take with this?

But Group B still doesn't have anything to do with you feeling that there's been a wrong committed with Group A.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation

section: Criminal law

when group b is the only of the two that deserves a wrong commited against them at this point in time, yet it happens the other way around - thats called injustice, and those of us who are not dead inside tend to have an issue with this

"
Twitter announced that it is permanently suspending Jacob Wohl, a 21-year-old Internet hoaxer and supporter of President Donald Trump, following the publication of a USA TODAY article in which he boasted of using the social media platform to spread lies and disinformation.
"
"
Twitter suspends conservative activist Jacob Wohl after he admits to making fake accounts
In an interview published Tuesday, he said he planned to create fake Twitter, Facebook profiles to "steer the left-wing votes in the primaries to what we feel are weaker candidates compared to Trump."
"
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/twitter-suspends-conservative-activist-jacob-wohl-after-he-admits-making-n976451


Ahah and there's still dumbfucks to defend this kind of guy.

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Feb 26 2019 06:24pm

bad kid admitted defamation crime AND (planning) creating multis accounts (lol same shit that d2jsp) to spread even more lies

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Feb 26 2019 06:28pm

What I'm trying to get as is this though: Should Group B be banned from Twitter?

- Yes: You're still upset that Group A is banned.
- No: You're still upset that Group A is banned.

So why focus on a question altogether irrelevant if we end up in the same spot at the end despite the answer? You believe Group A shouldn't be banned independent of how Twitter handles all other groups, and there's certainly a debate/discussion to be had there.

https://www.projectveritas.com/2019/02/27/facebook-insider-leaks-docs/

O'Keefe got a leaker from facebook that detailed some of their algorithmic censorship.
Their censors have powers to flag users as 'trolls' based on criterion like 'vocabulary' or behaviors like "meme creation/distribution" and "red-pilling normies" and will quarantine them, hide their comments, etc
They also silently 'deboost' livestreams by hiding them from viewers.

The leaker claims to have looked up historical uses of these censorship tools and found zero or next to zero uses on left-wing platforms like TYT, but was common on conservative media. Even the facebook guideline's example video was Lauren Chen criticizing social justice.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-northkorea-usa-reporters-idUSKCN1QG2BZ

'this is fine' - every trump shill now