Quote (Black XistenZ @ 22 Aug 2018 20:32)
if you agree that there is a large problem in this area, what do you propose to do about it? how do you propose to get the backwards culture and the low violence threshold of most of those immigrants under control? what do you suggest to rein in the exploding welfare costs they are causing (due to their generally low qualification level and their cultural incompatibility)? how do you want to solve these issues without closing the borders to this kind of immigrants?
cute act, like we haven't discussed this before. i already told you and we agreed on a couple of things, and then you went back to the same
'you just love open borders, immigrant crimes, and the exploitation of our social system' narrative, that poo also resorts to as soon as i disagree with some bigoted comment, or point out that cherry picking and listing crimes committed by people with foreign sounding names is not an argument.
just so you don't try that lazy
'oh you have no argument' (even though we both know we've been over this countless times) narrative: for example, i'm in favour of stricter controls in the first place to establish a real need for refuge, a low tolerance policy when it comes to unlawful behaviour including the loss of entitlements and deportation, restricted access to welfare based on willingness contribute, zero tolerance for violence...
i just find it funny that even when you try to appear reasonable and open to arguments, you just can't help but make idiotic generalising comments like 'backwards culture' and 'incompatibility' - as if every refugee and migrant was some muslim extremist insisting on strictly living by sharia law (inb4
'b-b-but i never said muslim, you're so racist, gotcha - i am very smart' - we both know what you're alluding to)...
but go ahead, now YOU tell me how your little bigot circlejerk is improving our society, how you are contributing to the solution of these problems by radicalising, fear mongering, cherry picking, supporting far right demagogues, and vilifying the people that are in favour of improving our society without dehumanising a whole race / religion / region of people - because that just leads to further divide, and the people not agreeing with your '30s methods approach gravitating towards opposing ANY kind of real change...
This post was edited by fender on Aug 22 2018 02:47pm