Quote (Werewulf @ Jun 23 2017 09:08pm)
fascinating. thanks for this my sports junkie is going to research the shit out of this :)
I expected for everyone to bitch at me and complain about that long lost. So was very nice to see the responses
Disclaimer: most of this was from top of my mind and this was 97 season and I was born in 89, so numbers and what not could be off in some spots. Also some of the parts that can't really be proven were obviously coming from biased Michigan fans inputs.
Regardless, it should be good read for you and will learn ya how the BCS came about.
Funny thing is Vegas claims Nebraska would be favored by like 7 points if they had played at the end of the year. To me that is very odd, considering Nebraska was a one dimensional option offense with Scott Frost running the show if I remember correctly. Michigan, on the other hand, had a very balanced offense with a very good QB in Brian Griese. The part that surprises me, though, is Michigan's defense was the best in the nation and one of the best ever, anchored by Heisman winning Charles Woodson. I just have no way of seeing an option offense moving the ball, let alone scoring, on one of the best defenses in years and an elite run stopping defense. Just ask the very good Penn State team that year how it went for them haha.
Edit: Michigan and Nebraska had 2 common opponents
Colorado- Michigan beat them 27-3 // Nebraska beat them 27-24
Baylor- Michigan beat them 38-3 // Nebraska beat them 49-21
The Big 12 was awful then, as well. In fact Nebraska played 8 ranked teams in Frost's two seasons while Michigan played that in just 1997. Michigan's schedule was light years better than Nebraska's patsy schedule that year.
Michigan beat 7, top 25 teams and 4, top ten teams
Nebraska beat 4, top 25 teams and 2, top ten teams
This post was edited by TooL89 on Jun 24 2017 07:44am