The issue is that this entire chart is littered with wrong info. For example, a capped hit rate of 95% is achieved at a 20 to 1 AR to Def ratio (meaning you have 20x the AR as your opponent has defense), when your level and your opponents level is the same. In your chart above, you have it listed at 18 to 1 ratio.

Just like always Dazer, you post inaccurate information to try to garner attention and seem like you know what you are talking about.

All you need to know about hit rate is this formula:
Chance to hit formula
(100 * AR / (AR + DR)) * (2 * atLvl / (atLvl + dfLvl))

AR = attack rating
DR = defense rating
atLvl = attacker level
dfLvl = defender level

Or you can reference this thread that has an accurate chart in it from 2016. And there is plenty other topics before it with actual correct info:
https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=75247442&f=87



0/10 info like usual from Dazer.

100 * AR / (AR + DR)) * (2 * atLvl / (atLvl + dfLvl))
=
100 * 18.000 / (18.000 + 1.000) * (2 * 99 / (99 + 99)
=
94,74% -> rounded up 95% (as I mentioned already above) which starts at 18:1 ratio yes.

Those CtH table information is rounded up numbers if >0.5% with identical levels for a quick aprox hit check. For different levels or non rounded up % amounts you can use the calculator or the formula if you want.

Stop spam my topics with ur trash, nobody cares about ur opinions, ty.

I’m posting facts.

Gtfo.

Idk why you are so attention starved that you feel the need to regurgitate information but always misconstrue it and turn it into wrong info.

This post was edited by Bui6Pays40Percent4Wins on Feb 11 2024 11:56am

Its not wrong info at all, wtf u talking about lol.

Alresdy spelled out above. Your approximations tell an inaccurate story in your hit rate.

You ignore in your table level correction differences

Your approximations for character defense aren’t correct.

Congrats, you posted a pretty table to garner attention but that is wrong

I give up on you, its as always a waste of time.

Yes stop posting wrong info like usual

nice but wrong