Lol. Typical ruski propaganda.
Soyuz rockets are from the 60s. Lol. First flight
28 November 1966.
ISS crew transport
Between 1 February 2003 and 26 July 2005 with the grounding of the United States Space Shuttle fleet, Soyuz was the only means of transportation to and from the International Space Station. This included the transfer of supplies, via Progress spacecraft, and crew changeovers. After the retirement of the Space Shuttle fleet in 2011, the United States space program was without any means to take astronauts into orbit, and NASA was dependent on the Soyuz to send crew into space until 2020.[5] NASA resumed crewed flights from the United States in 2020 through the Commercial Crew Development program.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soyuz_(rocket_family)
In other words, so what? This has nothing to do with putin being able to successfully launch an attack. Btw- more cosmonauts have died at the hand of ruski rockets, than Americans have died in space shuttles. What ever happened to russias Shuttle? Lol. Abadoned.
If tomahawks rain down on st Petersburg, will putin resort to attempting to launch nukes? That is the question.https://i.imgur.com/VuQF2op.jpeghttps://i.imgur.com/RysyNzr.jpeg
So clueless, so childish
Soyuz rockets are still being used it shows this is a very reliable missile, Russia's ICBMs are reliable too this is exactly the point I made.
I don't know in what sense this is propaganda, it's a simple observation, a cold hard fact.
Only complete idiots would talk about bombing Moscow with American long range missiles in the hands of Ukrainians because of Russia's updated nuclear doctrine.
They updated their nuclear doctrine in November 2024 and it's clear you don't know anything about it what are you even doing in this topic, lol
https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2024-12/news/russia-revises-nuclear-use-doctrineQuote
The revised nuclear doctrine includes language asserting that Russia “reserves the right” to use nuclear weapons not only in response to a nuclear attack, but also to respond to a conventional weapons attack that creates a “critical threat” to its “sovereignty and territorial integrity” or to that of Russia’s ally, Belarus. The previous version of Russia’s nuclear weapons doctrine, issued in 2020, reserves the right to use nuclear weapons if an attack on Russia threatens “the very existence of the state.”
Putin won't and most likely can't use nukes. As for what we've seen in this ongoing war in Ukraine, Russia relies on 80s era weapons. Do you believe Putin and his mob has actually spent the resources necessary for upkeep on ballistic nuclear missles? Post cold war- Putin mobs sold everything off. Putin likes to look strong. He clearly isnt.
Russia now is relying on China made junk. Look at how Iran went down.
China made defenses-0 usa stealth bombers with tomahawks -1
Missed this one, can't believe anyone could be this clueless
This post was edited by Djunior on Jul 17 2025 12:14pm